Literature DB >> 1987587

Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities.

A J Dwyer1.   

Abstract

Comparative studies of radiologic techniques commonly yield matched data due to the ease and desirability of performing all of the techniques on each of the patients. The two-by-two matched data array and the McNemar analysis provide a succinct format for the presentation and proper analysis of matched comparisons of binary (positive and negative) test results. When comparing tests, it is essential not to rely on just the statistical significance of the differences in sensitivities (or specificities); the magnitude of the differences must also be assessed. Confidence intervals provide a useful form of estimation by providing a range of plausible values and an indication of the precision of the estimate. The matched data array also indicates the complementarity of the diagnostic tests being compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1987587     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.178.2.1987587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

1.  Contribution of doppler sonography blood flow information to the diagnosis of metastatic cervical nodes in patients with head and neck cancer: assessment in relation to anatomic levels of the neck.

Authors:  K Yonetsu; M Sumi; M Izumi; M Ohki; S Eida; T Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Arthrography of painful hips following arthroplasty: digital versus plain film subtraction.

Authors:  C W Walker; R L FitzRandolph; D N Collins; G V Dalrymple
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jeongmin Choi; Sang Gyun Kim; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung; In Sung Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  PET/CT vs. non-contrast CT alone for surveillance 1-year post lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bari Dane; Vadim Grechushkin; April Plank; William Moore; Thomas Bilfinger
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-19

5.  Advantages of FDG-PET/CT over CT alone in the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ryuichi Karashima; Masayuki Watanabe; Yu Imamura; Satoshi Ida; Yoshifumi Baba; Shiro Iwagami; Yuji Miyamoto; Yasuo Sakamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Emergency department CT screening of patients with nontraumatic neurological symptoms referred to the posterior fossa: comparison of thin versus thick slice images.

Authors:  Shervin Kamalian; Wendy L Atkinson; Lauren A Florin; Stuart R Pomerantz; Michael H Lev; Javier M Romero
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-01-28

7.  Double-contrast barium enema study with computed radiography: assessment in detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Y Okada; S Kusano; T Endo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Comparison of plain radiographs and magnetic resonance images in the evaluation of periosteal reaction and osteoid matrix in osteosarcomas.

Authors:  R Dosdá; L Martí-Bonmatí; F Menor; F Aparisi; C Rodrigo; V Ricart
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Discrimination between neoplastic and nonneoplastic brain lesions by use of proton MR spectroscopy: the limits of accuracy with a logistic regression model.

Authors:  J Butzen; R Prost; V Chetty; K Donahue; R Neppl; W Bowen; S J Li; V Haughton; L Mark; T Kim; W Mueller; G Meyer; H Krouwer; S Rand
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Xihai Zhao; Jie Huang; Christopher J Francois; David Tuite; Xiaoming Bi; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.