Literature DB >> 29196763

Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Baptiste Caziot1,2,3, Benjamin T Backus1,2, Esther Lin4.   

Abstract

Surface orientation is an important visual primitive that can be estimated from monocular or binocular (stereoscopic) signals. Changes in motor planning occur within about 200 ms after either type of signal is perturbed, but the time it takes for apparent (perceived) slant to develop from stereoscopic cues is not known. Apparent slant sometimes develops very slowly (Gillam, Chambers, & Russo, 1988; van Ee & Erkelens, 1996). However, these long durations could reflect the time it takes for the visual system to resolve conflicts between slant cues that inevitably specify different slants in laboratory displays (Allison & Howard, 2000). We used a speed-accuracy tradeoff analysis to measure the time it takes to discriminate slant, allowing us to report psychometric functions as a function of response time. Observers reported which side of a slanted surface was farther, with a temporal deadline for responding that varied block-to-block. Stereoscopic slant discrimination rose above chance starting at 200 ms after stimulus onset. Unexpectedly, observers discriminated slant from binocular disparity faster than texture, and for stereoscopic whole-field stimuli faster than stereoscopic slant contrast stimuli. However, performance after the initial deviation from chance increased more rapidly for slant-contrast stimuli than whole-field stimuli. Discrimination latencies were similar for slants about the horizontal and vertical axes, but performance increased faster for slants about the vertical axis. Finally, slant from vertical disparity was somewhat slower than slant from horizontal disparity, which may reflect cue conflict. These results demonstrate, in contradiction with the previous literature, that the perception of slant from disparity happens very quickly-in fact, more quickly than the perception of slant from texture-and in comparable time to the simple perception of brightness from luminance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29196763      PMCID: PMC5713489          DOI: 10.1167/17.14.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  69 in total

1.  Temporal aspects of slant and inclination perception.

Authors:  R S Allison; I P Howard; B J Rogers; H Bridge
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis.

Authors:  M S Banks; I T Hooge; B T Backus
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception.

Authors:  G J Mitchison; S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Plaid slant and inclination thresholds can be predicted from components.

Authors:  P B Hibbard; K Langley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues.

Authors:  D C Knill
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The visual representation of 3D object orientation in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Ari Rosenberg; Noah J Cowan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The absolute disparity anomaly and the mechanism of relative disparities.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Dennis Levi; David Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Perceptual decision making in less than 30 milliseconds.

Authors:  Terrence R Stanford; Swetha Shankar; Dino P Massoglia; M Gabriela Costello; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.