Literature DB >> 7885809

Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization.

W Li1, L Matin.   

Abstract

The visual field exerts powerful effects on egocentric spatial localization along both horizontal and vertical dimensions. Thus, (1) prism-produced visual pitch and visual slant generate similar mislocalizations of visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and visually perceived straight ahead (VPSA) and (2) in darkness curare-produced extraocular muscle paresis under eccentric gaze generates similar mislocalizations in VPEL and VPSA that are essentially eliminated by introducing a normal visual field. In the present experiments, however, a search for influences of real visual slant on VPSA to correspond to the influences of visual pitch on VPEL failed to find one. Although the elevation corresponding to VPEL changes linearly with the pitch of a visual field consisting of two isolated 66.5 degrees-long pitched-from-vertical lines, the corresponding manipulation of change in the slant of either a horizontal two-line or a horizontal four-line visual field on VPSA did not occur. The average slope of the VPEL-versus-pitch function across 5 subjects was +0.40 over a +/- 30 degrees pitch range, but was indistinguishable from 0.00 for the VPSA-versus-slant function over a +/- 30 degrees slant range. Possible contributions to the difference between susceptibility of VPEL and VPSA to visual influence from extraretinal eye position information, gravity, and several retinal gradients are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7885809     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field.

Authors:  L Matin; W X Li
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Mislocalizations of visual elevation and visual vertical induced by visual pitch: the great circle model.

Authors:  L Matin; W Li
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-05-22       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.

Authors:  L Matin; C R Fox
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Judgments of eye level in light and in darkness.

Authors:  A E Stoper; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-11

5.  Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level.

Authors:  A E Stoper; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

6.  Mirror symmetry and parallelism: two opposite rules for the identity transform in space perception and their unified treatment by the Great Circle Model.

Authors:  L Matin; W Li
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1994

7.  The influence of a stationary single line in darkness on the visual perception of eye level.

Authors:  L Matin; W Li
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatial summation among coextensive and parallel line segments across wide separations (50 degrees): egocentric localization and the great circle model.

Authors:  L Matin; W Li
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Oculoparalytic illusion: visual-field dependent spatial mislocalizations by humans partially paralyzed with curare.

Authors:  L Matin; E Picoult; J K Stevens; M W Edwards; D Young; R MacArthur
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-04-09       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues.

Authors:  Jérôme Carriot; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Vincent Nougier; Corinne Cian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of a visual frame and of low radial accelerations on the visually perceived eye level.

Authors:  C Raphel; P A Barraud; C Koessler; C Cian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

4.  A new view of hemineglect based on the response properties of parietal neurones.

Authors:  A Pouget; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The importance of a visual horizon for distance judgments under severely degraded vision.

Authors:  Kristina M Rand; Margaret R Tarampi; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; William B Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.