Literature DB >> 1532191

Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field.

L Matin1, W X Li.   

Abstract

The physical elevation corresponding to visually perceived eye level (VPEL) changes linearly with the pitch of a visual field. Deviations from true eye level average more than 0.5 times the angle of pitch over a 65 degrees pitch range. A visual field consisting of 2 dim, isolated vertical lines in darkness is more than 4/5 as effective as that of a complexly structured visual field; 2 horizontal lines have a small and inconsistent effect. Differences in influence on VPEL between pitched-from-vertical and horizontal lines were predicted from an analysis that extracted differences in retinal perspective resulting from changes in pitch. The Great Circle Model (GCM), based on a spherical approximation to the erect, stationary eye, predicts the present results and results of 8 other sets of experiments. The model treats the influence of a single line on VPEL as systematically related to the elevation of the intersection between the great circle containing the image of the line and the central vertical retinal meridian; generalized GCM combines visual inputs with inputs from the body-referenced mechanism and maps onto the central nervous system.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1532191     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.1.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Judging beforehand the possibility of passing under obstacles without motion: the influence of egocentric and geocentric frames of reference.

Authors:  L Bringoux; G Robic; G M Gauthier; J L Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of gaze elevation on estimating the possibility of passing under high obstacles during body tilt.

Authors:  Aurore Bourrelly; Lionel Bringoux; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perceiving geographical slant.

Authors:  D R Proffitt; M Bhalla; R Gossweiler; J Midgett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

5.  Accuracy and adaptation of reaching and pointing in pitched visual environments.

Authors:  R B Welch; R B Post
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

6.  Effects of optical pitch on oculomotor control and the perception of target elevation.

Authors:  M M Cohen; S M Ebenholtz; B J Linder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

7.  Effects of a visual frame and of low radial accelerations on the visually perceived eye level.

Authors:  C Raphel; P A Barraud; C Koessler; C Cian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

8.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane.

Authors:  K Nemire; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-01

10.  Light and dark adaptation of visually perceived eye level controlled by visual pitch.

Authors:  L Matin; W Li
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.