Literature DB >> 8160367

The influence of a stationary single line in darkness on the visual perception of eye level.

L Matin1, W Li.   

Abstract

The angle of pitch of a visual field consisting of only a single vertical, 64 degrees-long, eccentrically-located line in otherwise total darkness influences the elevation of a target set to appear at eye level (VPEL). The influence changes linearly with the magnitude of pitch over the range from -30 degrees to +20 degrees. The average slope of the VPEL-vs-pitch function is +0.53. The influence on VPEL of a pitched visual field consisting of two parallel vertical lines is slightly greater (slope = +0.56), and the influence of the pitch of a complexly-structured well-illuminated pitched room is slightly greater yet (slope = +0.63). The pitch of a frontoparallel plane containing one horizontal line has a small influence on VPEL (slope = +0.08); the influence with two horizontal lines is slightly greater (slope = +0.18). The slope of the VPEL-vs-pitch function differs among individual subjects but is linear for each of the eight subjects. A great deal of consistency is manifested by individual subjects across all of the visual fields: an individual with a steep slope with one visual field tends to have a steep slope with all visual fields. The individual's characteristic response in total darkness is strongly correlated with the response to an erect well-illuminated visual field. The significant aspect of the pitched-from-vertical line stimulus is the change in orientation of its retinal image. An additional experiment with a small pupil (pilocarpine) indicates that cues related to other retinal gradients or to accommodation play no role in the influence of the visual field on VPEL. The experiments provide support for treating the visual influence on VPEL by means of the Great Circle Model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8160367     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90090-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues.

Authors:  Jérôme Carriot; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Vincent Nougier; Corinne Cian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of optical pitch on oculomotor control and the perception of target elevation.

Authors:  M M Cohen; S M Ebenholtz; B J Linder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

Review 3.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Light and dark adaptation of visually perceived eye level controlled by visual pitch.

Authors:  L Matin; W Li
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

5.  Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization.

Authors:  W Li; L Matin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.