Literature DB >> 21650089

The importance of a visual horizon for distance judgments under severely degraded vision.

Kristina M Rand1, Margaret R Tarampi, Sarah H Creem-Regehr, William B Thompson.   

Abstract

In two experiments we examined the role of visual horizon information on absolute egocentric distance judgments to on-ground targets. Sedgwick [1983, in Human and Machine Vision (New York: Academic Press) pp 425-458] suggested that the visual system may utilize the angle of declination from a horizontal line of sight to the target location (horizon distance relation) to determine absolute distances on infinite ground surfaces. While studies have supported this hypothesis, less is known about the specific cues (vestibular, visual) used to determine horizontal line of sight. We investigated this question by requiring observers to judge distances under degraded vision given an unaltered or raised visual horizon. The results suggest that visual horizon information does influence perception of absolute distances as evident through two different action-based measures: walking or throwing without vision to previously viewed targets. Distances were judged as shorter in the presence of a raised visual horizon. The results are discussed with respect to how the visual system accurately determines absolute distance to objects on a finite ground plane and for their implications for understanding space perception in low-vision individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21650089      PMCID: PMC3315150          DOI: 10.1068/p6843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  20 in total

1.  Distance perception mediated through nested contact relations among surfaces.

Authors:  J C Meng; H A Sedgwick
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-01

2.  Distance perception across spatial discontinuities.

Authors:  J C Meng; H A Sedgwick
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-01

3.  Absolute distance perception to locations off the ground plane.

Authors:  William B Thompson; Valentina Dilda; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The linear perspective information in ground surface representation and distance judgment.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-07

5.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A study of visually directed throwing in the presence of multiple distance cues.

Authors:  D W Eby; J M Loomis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-04

7.  Background Surface and Horizon Effects in the Perception of Relative Size and Distance.

Authors:  Kerem Ozkan; Myron L Braunstein
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2010-02

8.  Light and dark adaptation of visually perceived eye level controlled by visual pitch.

Authors:  L Matin; W Li
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

9.  Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization.

Authors:  W Li; L Matin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

10.  Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?

Authors:  J A Thomson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  15 in total

1.  Perception of affordances during long-term exposure to weightlessness in the International Space station.

Authors:  Aurore Bourrelly; Joseph McIntyre; Marion Luyat
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

2.  The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-01-22

3.  The influence of ground contact and visible horizon on perception of distance and size under severely degraded vision.

Authors:  Kristina M Rand; Margaret R Tarampi; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; William B Thompson
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2012

4.  Let me be your guide: physical guidance improves spatial learning for older adults with simulated low vision.

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Gaze behavior and the perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Gaze direction and the extraction of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Going the distance and beyond: simulated low vision increases perception of distance traveled during locomotion.

Authors:  Kristina M Rand; Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Eren Kiris; William B Thompson; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-21

8.  Spatial learning while navigating with severely degraded viewing: The role of attention and mobility monitoring.

Authors:  Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; William B Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Estimation of the horizon in photographed outdoor scenes by human and machine.

Authors:  Christian Herdtweck; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.