Literature DB >> 7869985

An analytical edge spread function model for computer fitting and subsequent calculation of the LSF and MTF.

J M Boone1, J A Seibert.   

Abstract

The previous work of Yin, Giger, and Doi [Med. Phys. 17, 962-966 (1990)] demonstrated that using a computerized fit of an analytic line spread function to experimentally measured data is very useful for determining the presampling modulation transfer function of an imaging system. In this report, the work of Yin et al. is extended to include an analytic expression for the edge spread function (ESF). By fitting experimentally determined edge spread function data to the analytical expression, the normalized line spread function (LSF) and the normalized modulation transfer function (MTF) can be easily calculated from four ESF fit coefficients. The extension from the line spread function to the edge spread function should be valuable in cases where slit measurements are impractical, for example, in very high resolution imaging systems where the required slit dimensions become impractically small, or in measurements of the transfer properties of scattered radiation or off-focus radiation, where large area exposures are necessary.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7869985     DOI: 10.1118/1.597264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Determining the MTF of medical imaging displays using edge techniques.

Authors:  Amarpreet S Chawla; Hans Roehrig; Jeffrey J Rodriguez; Jiahua Fan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Experimental evaluation of computerised tomography point spread function variability within the field of view: parametric models.

Authors:  S Doré; R E Kearney
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Singular value description of a digital radiographic detector: theory and measurements.

Authors:  Iacovos S Kyprianou; Aldo Badano; Brandon D Gallas; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms.

Authors:  Joshua D Evans; David G Politte; Bruce R Whiting; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Application of a variable filter for presampled modulation transfer function analysis with the edge method.

Authors:  Ryo Higashide; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Hiroshi Kunitomo; Kazuya Ohashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-06-19

7.  Impact of flat panel-imager veiling glare on scatter-estimation accuracy and image quality of a commercial on-board cone-beam CT imaging system.

Authors:  Dimitrios Lazos; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A high-resolution photon-counting breast CT system with tensor-framelet based iterative image reconstruction for radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Hao Gao; Bo Zhao; Hyo-Min Cho; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Exploration of chromatic aberration for multiplanar imaging: proof of concept with implications for fast, efficient autofocus.

Authors:  Martin Weinigel; Albert L Kellner; Jeffrey H Price
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.355

10.  All-optical optoacoustic microscopy based on probe beam deflection technique.

Authors:  Saher M Maswadi; Bennett L Ibey; Caleb C Roth; Dmitri A Tsyboulski; Hope T Beier; Randolph D Glickman; Alexander A Oraevsky
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2016-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.