Literature DB >> 21829011

Interaural stacked auditory brainstem response measures for detecting small unilateral acoustic tumors.

Manuel Don1, Betty Kwong, Chiemi Tanaka.   

Abstract

The Stacked auditory brainstem response (SABR) was developed and investigated as a screening tool for small (≤1 cm) unilateral acoustic tumors (vestibular schwannomas) that were missed by standard clinical auditory brainstem response (ABR) measures [Don et al.: Am J Otol 1997;18:608-621; Audiol Neurotol 2005;10:274-290]. While the SABR measure provided much greater sensitivity than the standard ABR measures for small tumor detection, we believed that the large intersubject variability of the SABR measure compromised both the sensitivity and specificity of the measure. However, as we demonstrate in this paper, the variability between ears of a given individual is small. Thus, we introduced an interaural SABR (ISABR) amplitude difference measure to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the SABR amplitude measure to detect small unilateral acoustic tumors. Its main advantages are two-fold. First, it is somewhat immune to variables that affect the absolute SABR amplitudes because it is a relative measure. Second, it is better at assessing tumor patients with very large and non-tumor patients with very small absolute SABR amplitudes. We believe that the ISABR is a useful addition to ABR measures aimed at detecting the presence of unilateral acoustic tumors.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21829011      PMCID: PMC3169358          DOI: 10.1159/000329364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  11 in total

1.  Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem responses.

Authors:  M Don; C Elberling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Successful detection of small acoustic tumors using the stacked derived-band auditory brain stem response amplitude.

Authors:  M Don; A Masuda; R Nelson; D Brackmann
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-09

3.  Use of quantitative measures of auditory brain-stem response peak amplitude and residual background noise in the decision to stop averaging.

Authors:  M Don; C Elberling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory brainstem response (ABR) peak amplitude variability reflects individual differences in cochlear response times.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  C Elberling; M Don
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1984

6.  Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian inference.

Authors:  C Elberling; O Wahlgreen
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1985

7.  Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man unsing high-pass noise masking.

Authors:  M Don; J J Eggermont
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. III. Latencies in cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  H J Rosenhamer; B Lindström; T Lundborg
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

9.  The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; B Kwong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Acoustic tumor detection with brain stem electric response audiometry.

Authors:  W A Selters; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1977-04
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.