Literature DB >> 17235663

Differentiation between post-menopausal women with and without hip fractures: enhanced evaluation of clinical DXA by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in the scan images.

H F Boehm1, T Vogel, A Panteleon, D Burklein, H Bitterling, M Reiser.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We introduce an algorithm to evaluate hip DXA scans using quantitative image analysis procedures based on the Minkowski functionals (MF) for differentiation between post-menopausal women with and without hip fracture. In a population of 30 post-menopausal women, the new parameter has a highly discriminative potential with a performance superior to standard densitometry providing complementary information compared to BMD.
INTRODUCTION: We introduce a novel algorithm to evaluate DXA scans of the hip using quantitative image analysis based on the Minkowski functionals (MF) to identify post-menopausal women with hip-fracture and to compare the results with densitometry.
METHODS: BMD of 30 women (73.9 +/- 10.3 years), 15 of whom had a recent hip fracture, is obtained by DXA using the "total hip" ROI. The topology of mineral distribution in the scan images is evaluated using the MF-based parameter MF2D. ROC analysis is employed to assess the discriminative potential (fracture/non-fracture).
RESULTS: The area-under-the-curve (AUC) for identification of patients with/without fractures by BMD is .72(p = 0.04), AUC for MF2D is .85(p = 0.001). No statistically significant correlation exists between MF2D and BMD. By discriminant analysis we can show that by combination of MF2D and BMD the outcome increases significantly: using BMD or MF2D alone, 63% and 70% of cases are classified correctly versus 77% of cases in the multivariate model.
CONCLUSION: The topology-based parameter has a high predictive potential with respect to identification of patients with high risk of hip fracture, performance is superior to densitometry. The new method provides information complementary to BMD. Best classification results are obtained when BMD and MF2D are combined in a multivariate model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17235663     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0302-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  23 in total

1.  Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; G Gualtieri; N Malavolta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured in situ with intact soft tissues, with the in vitro failure loads of the proximal femur.

Authors:  E M Lochmüller; J B Zeller; D Kaiser; F Eckstein; J Landgraf; R Putz; R Steldinger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  C G Alonso; M D Curiel; F H Carranza; R P Cano; A D Peréz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  T Lang; P Augat; S Majumdar; X Ouyang; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Spatial distribution of femoral bone mineral in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry images: a possible technique to improve discrimination between normal and osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  E Berry; J G Truscott; S P Stewart; M A Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics.

Authors:  S Majumdar; D Newitt; A Mathur; D Osman; A Gies; E Chiu; J Lotz; J Kinney; H Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study.

Authors:  S El-Kaissi; J A Pasco; M J Henry; S Panahi; J G Nicholson; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Effect of hormone replacement, alendronate, or combination therapy on hip structural geometry: a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Susan L Greenspan; Thomas J Beck; Neil M Resnick; Rajib Bhattacharya; Robert A Parker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans.

Authors:  C Bergot; V Bousson; A Meunier; M Laval-Jeantet; J D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Predictors of first hip fracture and mortality post fracture in older women.

Authors:  P Fitzpatrick; P N Kirke; L Daly; I Van Rooij; E Dinn; H Burke; J Heneghan; G Bourke; J Masterson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  13 in total

1.  [Treatment results after cemented hemiprosthesis for care of unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  S Grote; F Stegmeyer; V Bogner; P Biberthaler; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Trabecular bone structure analysis in the osteoporotic spine using a clinical in vivo setup for 64-slice MDCT imaging: comparison to microCT imaging and microFE modeling.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Karsten Schwieger; Markus B Huber; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Fabio M Ulivieri; Barbara C Silva; Francesco Sardanelli; Didier Hans; John P Bilezikian; Renata Caudarella
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Introducing Anisotropic Minkowski Functionals and Quantitative Anisotropy Measures for Local Structure Analysis in Biomedical Imaging.

Authors:  Axel Wismüller; Titas De; Eva Lochmüller; Felix Eckstein; Mahesh B Nagarajan
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-03-29

5.  Random field assessment of inhomogeneous bone mineral density from DXA scans can enhance the differentiation between postmenopausal women with and without hip fractures.

Authors:  Xuanliang Neil Dong; Rajeshwar Pinninti; Timothy Lowe; Patricia Cussen; Joyce E Ballard; David Di Paolo; Mukul Shirvaikar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Volumetric quantitative characterization of human patellar cartilage with topological and geometrical features on phase-contrast X-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Mahesh B Nagarajan; Paola Coan; Markus B Huber; Paul C Diemoz; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Managing osteoporosis in ulcerative colitis: something new?

Authors:  Luca Petruccio Piodi; Alessandro Poloni; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Computer-aided diagnosis in phase contrast imaging X-ray computed tomography for quantitative characterization of ex vivo human patellar cartilage.

Authors:  Mahesh B Nagarajan; Paola Coan; Markus B Huber; Paul C Diemoz; Christian Glaser; Axel Wismuller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Using Radon transform of standard radiographs of the hip to differentiate between post-menopausal women with and without fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; M Körner; W Mutschler; M Reiser; K-J Pfeifer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Local topological analysis of densitometer-generated scan images of the proximal femur for differentiation between patients with hip fracture and age-matched controls.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; A Horng; M Notohamiprodjo; A Panteleon; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.