Literature DB >> 1053498

An audit of obstetric care in a university family medicine department and an obstetrics-gynecology department.

J W Ely, K Ueland, M J Gordon.   

Abstract

The care of obstetric patients in a university family medicine department was compared with that in the obstetrics-gynecology department of the same university. The obstetric service patients tended to be at higher risk due to a higher black population (24.2 percent vs 6.3 percent), greater prepregnancy weight (mean 154.0 lbs vs 113.9 lbs), and a greater number of patients referred from the community because of prenatal complications. However, the family medicine patients had a higher incidence of premature rupture of membranes (26 percent vs 11 percent), and were therefore at risk for several complications. Family medicine nulliparas had first stages of labor which lasted an average of 12.2 hours as opposed to obstetric service nulliparas whose first stages averaged only 9.2 hours. There were more family medicine than obstetric service patients who received no anesthesia (18.0 percent vs 10.2 percent). Elective low forceps were used more often by obstetric service physicians than by family physicians (28.2 percent vs 15.3 percent). Mothers on the family medicine service had more puerperal complications than those on the obstetric service (16.0 percent vs 5.6 percent). No serious discrepancies in quality of care could be found between the two services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1053498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  11 in total

1.  Outcome of high-risk pregnancies in a community health centre.

Authors:  C P Herbert; M Dyer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Referral pattern and rate of intervention in a small rural obstetrical practice.

Authors:  J Lemelin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Midwifery in a family practice.

Authors:  A J Reid; J G Galbraith
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Topics for family medicine research in obstetrics.

Authors:  W E Hogg; N Calonge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Training for primary care: a family practice perspective.

Authors:  J P Geyman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1982-01

7.  The case for small rural hospital obstetrics.

Authors:  W Hogg; J Lemelin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  The canadian family practice accoucheur.

Authors:  M Klein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Relation of family physician or specialist care to obstetric interventions and outcomes in patients at low risk: a western Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  E H Krikke; N R Bell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; S A Dobie; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; D Gould; T R Raine; T J Benedetti; M J Pirani; E B Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.