Literature DB >> 12041842

Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?

Michael C Klein1, Andrea Spence, Janusz Kaczorowski, Ann Kelly, Stefan Grzybowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of births attended by individual family physicians who practice intrapartum care varies. We wanted to determine if the practice-volume relations that have been shown in other fields of medical practice also exist in maternity care practice by family doctors.
METHODS: For the period April 1997 to August 1998, we analyzed all singleton births at a major maternity teaching hospital for which the family physician was the responsible physician. Physicians were grouped into 3 categories on the basis of the number of births they attended each year: fewer than 12, 12 to 24, and 25 or more. Physicians with a low volume of deliveries (72 physicians, 549 births), those with a medium volume of deliveries (34 physicians, 871 births) and those with a high volume of deliveries (46 physicians, 3024 births) were compared in terms of maternal and newborn outcomes. The main outcome measures were maternal morbidity, 5-minute Apgar score and admission of the baby to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care unit. Secondary outcomes were obstetric procedures and consultation patterns.
RESULTS: There was no difference among the 3 volume cohorts in terms of rates of maternal complications of delivery, 5-minute Apgar scores of less than 7 or admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit or the special care unit, either before or after adjustment for parity, pregnancy-induced hypertension, diabetes, ethnicity, lone parent status, maternal age, gestational age, newborn birth weight and newborn head circumference at birth. High- and medium-volume family physicians consulted with obstetricians less often than low-volume family physicians (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.586 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.479-0.718] and 0.739 [95% CI 0.583-0.935] respectively). High- and medium-volume family physicians transferred the delivery to an obstetrician less often than low-volume family physicians (adjusted OR 0.668 [95% CI 0.542-0.823] and 0.776 [95% CI 0.607-0.992] respectively). Inductions were performed by medium-volume family physicians more often than by low-volume family physicians (adjusted OR 1.437 [95% CI 1.036-1.992].
INTERPRETATION: Family physicians' delivery volumes were not associated with adverse outcomes for mothers or newborns. Low-volume family physicians referred patients and transferred deliveries to obstetricians more frequently than high- or medium-volume family physicians. Further research is needed to validate these findings in smaller facilities, both urban and rural.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12041842      PMCID: PMC111076     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  34 in total

1.  Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  T A Gordon; H M Bowman; E B Bass; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; R F Heitmiller; M A Choti; G P Burleyson; G Hsieh; J L Cameron
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Effect of academic affiliation and obstetric volume on clinical outcome and cost of childbirth.

Authors:  F A Garcia; H B Miller; G R Huggins; T A Gordon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes.

Authors:  A B Nathens; G J Jurkovich; R V Maier; D C Grossman; E J MacKenzie; M Moore; F P Rivara
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Maternal complications of normal deliveries: variation among rural hospitals.

Authors:  P E Heaphy; S L Bernard
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Outcomes of coronary angioplasty procedures performed in rural hospitals.

Authors:  C Maynard; N R Every; M K Chapko; J L Ritchie
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Initial development of a system-wide maternal-fetal outcomes assessment program.

Authors:  W M Novicoff; D P Wagner; W A Knaus; E K Kane; F Cecere; E Draper; J E Ferguson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Is there a positive volume-outcome relationship in peripheral vascular surgery? Results of a systematic review.

Authors:  P Shackley; R Slack; A Booth; J Michaels
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.069

10.  Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population.

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; N Baxter; A Balshem; E Ross; Z Cohen; R McLeod; P Engstrom; E Sigurdson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  10 in total

1.  Delivery volume debated.

Authors:  Dan Dattani
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Delivery volume debated.

Authors:  T B MacLachlan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Delivery volume debated.

Authors:  Erik J Lindbloom; Michael L LeFevre
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Does experience or delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcomes?

Authors:  Ann Kelly; Michael C Klein; Janusz Kaczorowsk; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Family physician and obstetrician episiotomy rates in low-risk obstetrics in southern Alberta.

Authors:  Andrea Hargrove; Kristy Penner; Tyler Williamson; Sue Ross
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Association between hospital-level obstetric quality indicators and maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Jennifer Zeitlin; Paul L Hebert; Amy Balbierz; Natalia Egorova
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Effect of hospital setting and volume on clinical outcomes in women with gestational and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  W K Nicholson; F Witter; N R Powe
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Maternal outcomes of cesarean sections: do generalists' patients have different outcomes than specialists' patients?

Authors:  Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Sarah Newbery; Len Kelly; Bruce Weaver; Scott Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Effect of hospital volume on maternal outcomes in women with prior cesarean delivery undergoing trial of labor.

Authors:  Jen Jen Chang; David M Stamilio; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Centralized or decentralized perinatal surgical care for rural women: a realist review of the evidence on safety.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Kevin McCartney; Kim Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.