Literature DB >> 3806026

Adverse perinatal outcomes: is physician specialty a risk factor?

P Franks, S Eisinger.   

Abstract

An investigation was conducted in a community hospital to determine whether physician specialty (obstetrics vs family medicine) is a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes. Over a three-year period, there were 6,856 deliveries, of which 713 (10.4 percent) were attended by family physicians. Overall, there were 301 (4.4 percent) cases with adverse outcomes, of which 32 (10.6 percent) were attended by family physicians. The charts of a weighted random sample of 117 cases with adverse outcomes and 468 controls were reviewed to determine potential risk factors, including prenatal risk status, race, insurance, and specialty of the attending physician. The risk ratio for family physician as attending was 0.99 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.42) after multivariate adjustment for the other risk factors. Only high prenatal risk status was found to be an independent predictor (risk ratio 1.75, 95 percent confidence interval, 1.23 to 2.49). A chart review of a random sample of 146 patients (73 each of family physicians and obstetricians) revealed no difference in the proportion of high-risk patients in each specialty. It is concluded that in the setting studied, specialty is not a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes, and that this finding is not confounded by the patient's prenatal risk status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3806026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  8 in total

1.  Factors influencing family physicians to continue providing obstetric care.

Authors:  T S Nesbitt; N B Kahn; J L Tanji; J E Scherger
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-07

2.  Choosing to Practise Obstetrics: What factors influence family practice residents?

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Midwifery in a family practice.

Authors:  A J Reid; J G Galbraith
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Rural obstetrics: a 5-year prospective study of the outcomes of all pregnancies in a remote northern community.

Authors:  S C Grzybowski; A S Cadesky; W E Hogg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization.

Authors:  James M Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-20

7.  Relation of family physician or specialist care to obstetric interventions and outcomes in patients at low risk: a western Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  E H Krikke; N R Bell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Consultation in family practice obstetrics.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.