Literature DB >> 2511975

Outcome of pregnancies referred to a general practitioner maternity unit in a district hospital.

A Prentice1, S M Walton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To audit the outcome of pregnancies booked for confinement in a general practitioner maternity unit in a district general hospital.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of case records.
SETTING: General practitioner maternity unit in a district general hospital. PATIENTS: 685 Women referred to a general practitioner unit in 1987.
RESULTS: 315 Nulliparous women and 330 multiparous women were booked for confinement; 202 women transferred to consultant care before delivery and a further 104 during labour or after delivery. Recognised risk factors, other than nulliparity, rarely predicted the need for transfer. Confinement in the general practitioner unit was associated with low intervention and good fetal outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The general practitioner maternity unit provides a safe alternative for confinement in low risk pregnancies. High rates of transfer deny this facility to many women who desire confinement in a low technology environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2511975      PMCID: PMC1837972          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6707.1090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

1.  Obstetric audit in general practice.

Authors:  G N Marsh
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-10-15

2.  Are isolated maternity units run by general practitioners dangerous?

Authors:  G Young
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-03-21

3.  Audit of 26 years of obstetrics in general practice.

Authors:  G N Marsh; D M Channing
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-04-22

4.  Outcome of women booked into an isolated general practice maternity unit over eight years.

Authors:  T Garrett; W House; S W Lowe
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-11

5.  Encouraging GP intranatal care.

Authors:  G Marsh
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1988-10-22

6.  General practitioner obstetrics: does risk prediction work?

Authors:  J L Reynolds; P L Yudkin; M J Bull
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-07

7.  General practitioner participation in intranatal care in the northern region in 1983.

Authors:  G N Marsh; H A Cashman; I T Russell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-03-30

8.  Contribution of isolated general practitioner maternity units.

Authors:  A J Cavenagh; K M Phillips; B Sheridan; E M Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-12

9.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02

10.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Choice and chance in low risk maternity care.

Authors:  R Campbell; A Macfarlane; S Cavenagh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-14

2.  Problems of general practitioner obstetrics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1990-09

3.  Contribution of general practitioners to hospital intrapartum care in maternity units in England and Wales in 1988.

Authors:  L F Smith; D Jewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

4.  Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group.

Authors:  J Davies; E Hey; W Reid; G Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

5.  Consultation in family practice obstetrics.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.