Literature DB >> 773959

Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria.

D Stargel, F S Thompson, S E Phillips, G L Lombard, V R Dowell.   

Abstract

The Minitek Miniaturized System (BBL) was modified for characterization of anaerobic bacteria. The modified system and the conventional Center for Disease Control method were used to test a variety of anaerobic bacteria, and results were compared. Tests performed by both techniques were indole and H2S production, esculin hydrolysis, nitrate reduction, and fermentation of glucose, mannitol, lactose, sucrose, maltose, salicin, glycerol, xylose, arabinose, mannose, rhamnose, and trehalose. The manufacturer's recommended procedure for the Minitek system was modified by using a new suspension medium (Lombard-Dowell broth) and an inoculum equivalent to the density of a McFarland no. 5 nephelometer standard. The Minitek results, recorded after 48 h, agreed satisfactorily with the conventional test results, usually recorded after 5 to 7 days of incubation. In the examination of 80 strains representing 22 different species or subspecies of anaerobic bacteria, with 16 biochemical tests performed in triplicate, 93.8% of the Minitek test results agreed with those of the corresponding conventional tests. Only tests for indole, H2S, and nitrate reduction gave less than 90% agreement. It was concluded that the modified Minitek system is a suitable substitute for the more expensive and time-consuming conventional procedure for determining carbohydrate fermentation and esculin hydrolysis by anaerobes. This system, when used in conjunction with other tests, can effectively aid in the definitive identification of commonly isolated anaerobes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 773959      PMCID: PMC274286          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.291-301.1976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Quicker bacteriological results.

Authors:  R H WEAVER
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1954 Jan-Feb

2.  On some practical applications of impregnated, dried paper discs containing various reagents for the cultural differentiation of bacteria.

Authors:  M L SNYDER; D DONNELLY; M J NIX
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1951 May-Jun

3.  Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  T E Kiehn; K Brennan; P D Ellner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

4.  API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; K M Tomfohrde; D L Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-09

5.  Micromethod system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S E Starr; F S Thompson; V R Dowell; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-05

6.  Evaluation of the BBL Minitek system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S L Hansen; D R Hardesty; B M Myers
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-11

7.  Rapid methods for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  P C Schreckenberger; D J Blazevic
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-11

8.  [Micromethod of identifying bacteria. I. Value of the quantification of biochemical characteristics].

Authors:  J Buissière; P Nardon
Journal:  Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris)       Date:  1968-08

9.  Evaluation of media and reagents for indole-spot tests in anaerobic bacteriology.

Authors:  V L Sutter; W T Carter
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Practical method for isolation of anerobic bacteria in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  W J Martin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-12
View more
  32 in total

1.  Comparison of Minitek and conventional methods for the biochemical characterization of oral streptococci.

Authors:  J A Setterstrom; A Gross; R S Stanko
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  T D Wilkins; S Chalgren
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of different medium bases for the semiquantitative isolation of anaerobes from vaginal secretions.

Authors:  A Sheppard; C Cammarata; D H Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of kanamycin-esculin bile agar for isolation and presumptive identification of Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  P C Chan; R K Porschen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species.

Authors:  C W Hanson; R Cassorla; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Identification of viridans streptococci on the Minitek Miniaturised Differentiation System.

Authors:  Y Holloway; M Schaareman; J Dankert
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of routine subcultures of macroscopically negative blood cultures for detection of anaerobes.

Authors:  P R Murray; J E Sondag
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of Port-A-Cul transport system for protection of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  E Mena; F S Thompson; A Y Armfield; V R Dowell; D J Reinhardt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Gastrointestinal microecology of BALB/c nude mice.

Authors:  J F Brown; E Balish
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Carbohydrate repression of catalase synthesis in Bacteroides fragilis.

Authors:  E M Gregory; B J Veltri; D L Wagner; T D Wilkins
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.