Literature DB >> 353071

Evaluation of Port-A-Cul transport system for protection of anaerobic bacteria.

E Mena, F S Thompson, A Y Armfield, V R Dowell, D J Reinhardt.   

Abstract

The protection of anaerobes in Port-A-Cul (PAC) transport system (Bioquest, Div. of Becton, Dickinson &Co., Cockeysville, Md.) tubes and vials was studied. Ten species of obligately anaerobic bacteria commonly isolated from clinical specimens were used to prepare simulated swab and fluid specimens in high and low concentrations. Samples in PAC tubes and vials were held for 2, 24, and 48 h at ambient temperature and in a refrigerator. In addition, samples of the simulated specimens were exposed to controlled anaerobic and aerobic conditions in vented tubes and vials, with and without PAC medium, at ambient and refrigerator temperatures. Viable bacterial colony counts from specimens in PAC tubes and vials used as recommended by the manufacturer were consistently greater than those from specimens exposed to the different controlled conditions. The protection in PAC was about equal for specimens with either high or low concentrations of bacteria. Protection of the anaerobes in PAC was more obvious with swab than with fluid specimens. Quantitative recovery of anaerobes from refrigerated PAC samples, with few exceptions, was comparable to that from PAC samples held at ambient temperature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 353071      PMCID: PMC275109          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.8.1.28-35.1978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

1.  Anaerobic specimen transport device.

Authors:  T D Wilkins; F Jimenez-Ulate
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Survival of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria on cotton swabs in three transport systems.

Authors:  J W Yrios; E Balish; A Helstad; C Field; S Inhorn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Recovery of anaerobic, facultative, and aerobic bacteria from clinical specimens in three anaerobic transport systems.

Authors:  A G Helstad; J L Kimball; D G Maki
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Theoretical basis for anaerobic methodology.

Authors:  D J Hentges; B R Maier
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Evaluation of bacteriological transport media.

Authors:  D L Christian; G M Ederer
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1973-01

6.  Bacterial killing by bacteriostatic saline solutions--potential for diagnostic error.

Authors:  M F Rein; G L Mandell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-10-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A miniature anaerobic jar for tissue transport or for cultivation of anaerobes.

Authors:  H R Attebery; S M Finegold
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Survival of human dental plaque flora in various transport media.

Authors:  S A Syed; W J Loesche
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-10

9.  Efficiency of a transport medium for the recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from applicator swabs.

Authors:  A L Barry; G D Fay; R L Sauer
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-07

10.  Oxygen sensitivity of various anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  W J Loesche
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of two transport systems for recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from abscesses.

Authors:  I Brook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A transport method for swab specimens submitted for aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology.

Authors:  M Alfa; A Lee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Collection and transport of specimens for anaerobic culture.

Authors:  H O Hallander; A Flodström; C Aberg
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.553

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.