Literature DB >> 4577172

Micromethod system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

S E Starr, F S Thompson, V R Dowell, A Balows.   

Abstract

A micromethod multitest system prepared by Analytab Products, Inc. and conventional tests employed at the Center for Disease Control for identification of anaerobes were compared. All procedures were conducted in an anaerobic glove box. A total of 104 cultures, including 18 reference strains and 86 diagnostic cultures, were examined. Ninety-one percent of the total tests performed with the two systems were in agreement. Greater than 90% agreement between the two systems was obtained with 12 of the 17 differential tests compared. The tests for nitrate reduction and H(2)S production gave the poorest agreement, 77.8 and 80.8%, respectively. Only 66% of the 86 diagnostic cultures could be presumptively identified with the micromethod system supplemented only with microscopy and colonial characteristics. However, when appropriate supplementary tests and gas-liquid chromatography were used with the micromethod system, 85% of the 86 strains could be identified. When Ehrlich reagent, instead of Kovac reagent, was used with the micromethod to test for indole, the agreement in identification was raised to 93%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4577172      PMCID: PMC380900          DOI: 10.1128/am.25.5.713-717.1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0003-6919


  5 in total

1.  Rapid methods for the identification of clostridia.

Authors:  L KAUFMAN; R H WEAVER
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Comparison of techniques for isolation and identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  V R Dowell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; K M Tomfohrde; D L Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-09

4.  Isolation of anaerobic bacteria from human gingiva and mouse cecum by means of a simplified glove box procedure.

Authors:  A Arank; S A Syed; E B Kenney; R Freter
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-04

5.  Evaluation of accuracy of multitest micromethod system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J A Washington; P K Yu; W J Martin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-09
  5 in total
  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of a test kit for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  A Dahlbäck; T Wadström
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1975-09-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparison of three procedures for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H B Moore; V L Sutter; S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Influence of the collection and transport of specimens on the recovery of bacteria from peritonsillar abscesses.

Authors:  H O Hallander; A Flodström; K Holmberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid fermentation testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  P C Schreckenberger; D J Blazevic
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  D Stargel; F S Thompson; S E Phillips; G L Lombard; V R Dowell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species.

Authors:  C W Hanson; R Cassorla; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clinical evaluation of a simple, rapid procedure for the presumptive identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  J W Holland; S M Gagnet; S A Lewis; L R Stauffer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Oxygen tolerance of fresh clinical anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  F P Tally; P R Stewart; V L Sutter; J E Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Use of cefoxitin, new cephalosporin-like antibiotic, in the treatment of aerobic and anaerobic infections.

Authors:  S R Nair; C E Cherubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Biochemical, enzymatic, and serological differentiation of Peptococcus indolicus (Christiansen) Sørensen from Peptococcus asaccharolyticus (Distaso) Douglas.

Authors:  O Schwan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.