Literature DB >> 4562482

API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

P B Smith, K M Tomfohrde, D L Rhoden, A Balows.   

Abstract

The API system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae was evaluated with 366 cultures. Overall accuracy of identification was 96.4%; of the 13 cultures misidentified, 7 were atypical strains.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1972        PMID： 4562482      PMCID： PMC376540          DOI： 10.1128/am.24.3.449-452.1972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN： 0003-6919


  4 in total

1.  Simplified tests for some amino acid decarboxylases and for the arginine dihydrolase system.

Authors:  V MØLLER
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1955

2.  Urea Decomposition as a Means of Differentiating Proteus and Paracolon Cultures from Each Other and from Salmonella and Shigella Types.

Authors:  W B Christensen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1946-10       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  [Micromethod of identifying bacteria. I. Value of the quantification of biochemical characteristics].

Authors:  J Buissière; P Nardon
Journal:  Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris)       Date:  1968-08

4.  Evaluation of accuracy of multitest micromethod system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J A Washington; P K Yu; W J Martin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-09
  4 in total
  96 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the analytab (API 20E) system.

Authors:  D A Butler; C M Lobregat; T L Gavan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Re-evaluation of the Auxotab (Inolex) Enteric 1 System for identification of enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  L M Braune; F E Kocka
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1975-07-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Comparison of three procedures for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H B Moore; V L Sutter; S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the R/B and Minitek systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M Shayegani; M E Hubbard; T Hiscott; D McGlynn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the Enteric Analyzer, an instrument to aid in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D J Brenner; A Balows
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Accuracy of six commercially available systems for identification of members of the family vibrionaceae.

Authors:  Caroline M O'Hara; Evangeline G Sowers; Cheryl A Bopp; Sarah B Duda; Nancy A Strockbine
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Effects of changes in pH, medium, and inoculum size on the in vitro activity of amifloxacin against urinary isolates of Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Iravani; G S Welty; B R Newton; G A Richard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Evaluation of Gram-stain screen and Micro-ID methods for direct identification of Enterobacteriaceae from urines.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; C C Olmstead
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Evaluation of a two-hour method for screening pathogens from stool specimens.

Authors:  L C Greene; P C Appelbaum; J A Kellogg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Multiple biotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae in single clinical specimens.

Authors:  M I de Silva; S J Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.948
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.