Literature DB >> 2182666

Comparison of different medium bases for the semiquantitative isolation of anaerobes from vaginal secretions.

A Sheppard1, C Cammarata, D H Martin.   

Abstract

Two studies were performed to determine the best medium for the isolation of anaerobes from vaginal secretions. In the first, three different medium bases (brucella, Centers for Disease Control [CDC], and Schaedler) were compared semiquantitatively for ability to support the growth of gram-negative anaerobes from vaginal fluid. Media were supplemented with laked sheep blood, kanamycin, and vancomycin. The brucella base agar formulation supported the growth of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli better than either the CDC or Schaedler base agar formulation. In a second study, nonselective brucella and CDC base sheep blood agar were compared for ability to support the growth of anaerobic gram-positive cocci. Anaerobic gram-positive cocci grew in higher concentrations on CDC base agar than on brucella base agar. On the basis of these observations, we recommend that a CDC base sheep blood agar be used for the nonselective plate and a brucella base plate supplemented with laked sheep blood, kanamycin, and vancomycin be used for isolation of gram-negative bacilli in studies of the anaerobic flora of the female genital tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2182666      PMCID: PMC269643          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.3.455-457.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  6 in total

1.  Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  D Stargel; F S Thompson; S E Phillips; G L Lombard; V R Dowell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Relative recovery of anaerobes on different isolation media.

Authors:  J E Sondag; M Ali; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Growth of clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria on agar media: effects of media composition, storage conditions, and reduction under anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of enrichment, storage, and age of blood agar medium in relation to its ability to support growth of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  C W Hanson; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multiple selective media for the isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens.

Authors:  M W Wren
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A comparison of selective media for the isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical material.

Authors:  J Downes; L Stern; J H Andrew
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.306

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility testing methods: results and recommendations for improvement.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron; R J Goldman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.