Literature DB >> 7734525

Quality control of cathode-ray tube monitors for medical imaging using a simple photometer.

D M Parsons1, Y Kim, D R Haynor.   

Abstract

As computer monitors are used more in medical imaging and the use of picture archiving and communication system workstations with multiple monitors is increasing, quality control protocols become necessary to track subtle variations in performance characteristics. Several tests based on previously published work were applied to 10 monitors of three different types over a period of 5 months. Each test is explained, and the results are shown. For example, without corrective adjustments, 2 monitors from the same workstation showed a small but steady decline in maximum luminance of 8.1% and 7.6% over the course of 11 weeks that was not perceptible. From this experience, we took the first step toward developing a practical and useful quality control protocol. The proposed protocol requires only a photometer and the ability to generate the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) test pattern, and takes approximately 5 minutes per monitor per week to gather data.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7734525     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  8 in total

1.  Quality monitoring of soft-copy displays for medical radiography.

Authors:  G G Reiker; N Gohel; E Muka; G J Blaine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Evaluation of video gray-scale display.

Authors:  R D Nawfel; K H Chan; D J Wagenaar; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray tube displays.

Authors:  H Roehrig; H Blume; T L Ji; M Browne
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Cathode-ray tube displays for medical imaging.

Authors:  P A Keller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Hardware and software requirements for a picture archiving and communication system's diagnostic workstations.

Authors:  D R Haynor; D V Smith; H W Park; Y Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  J E Gray
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Performance characteristics and image fidelity of gray-scale monitors.

Authors:  S J Dwyer; B K Stewart; J W Sayre; D R Aberle; M I Boechat; J C Honeyman; J M Boehme; H Roehrig; T L Ji; G J Blaine
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Evaluation of the medical diagnostic imaging support system based on 2 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  D V Smith; S Smith; G N Bender; J R Carter; Y Kim; M A Cawthon; R G Leckie; J C Weiser; J Romlein; F Goeringer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of irreversible JPEG compression for a clinical ultrasound practice.

Authors:  Kenneth R Persons; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Nicholas T Charboneau; J Charboneau; E James; Bruce R Douglas; Ann P Salmon; John M Knudsen; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Frequency and impact of high-resolution monitor failure in a filmless imaging department.

Authors:  E L Siegel; B I Reiner; M Cadogan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.

Authors:  Emily Seto; Ali Ursani; Joseph A Cafazzo; Peter G Rossos; Anthony C Easty
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Modular extension of the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard to support new diagnostic imaging modalities and services.

Authors:  W D Bidgood; S C Horii
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Development of a randomised contrast detail digital phantom for observer detectability study.

Authors:  Ms Nizam; Kh Ng; Bjj Abdullah
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-07-01

6.  Quality assurance and quality control of an intensive care unit picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  D M Tucker; M McEachern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Clinical image quality evaluation for panoramic radiography in Korean dental clinics.

Authors:  Bo-Ram Choi; Da-Hye Choi; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Soon-Chul Choi; Kwang-Hak Bae; Sam-Sun Lee
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-09-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.