Literature DB >> 21973359

Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Kachina Allen1, David Alais, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham, Simon Carlile.   

Abstract

In many natural settings, spatial release from masking aids speech intelligibility, especially when there are competing talkers. This paper describes a series of three experiments that investigate the role of prior knowledge of masker location on phoneme identification and spatial release from masking. In contrast to previous work, these experiments use initial stop-consonant identification as a test of target intelligibility to ensure that listeners had little time to switch the focus of spatial attention during the task. The first experiment shows that target phoneme identification was worse when a masker played from an unexpected location (increasing the consonant identification threshold by 2.6 dB) compared to when an energetically very similar and symmetrically located masker came from an expected location. In the second and third experiments, target phoneme identification was worse (increasing target threshold levels by 2.0 and 2.6 dB, respectively) when the target was played unexpectedly on the side from which the masker was expected compared to when the target came from an unexpected, symmetrical location in the hemifield opposite the expected location of the masker. These results support the idea that listeners modulate spatial attention by both focusing resources on the expected target location and withdrawing attentional resources from expected locations of interfering sources.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21973359      PMCID: PMC3206908          DOI: 10.1121/1.3631666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  47 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory spatial attention using interaural time differences.

Authors:  A J Sach; N I Hill; P J Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evidence for spatial tuning in informational masking using the probe-signal method.

Authors:  T L Arbogast; G Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contribution of spectral cues to human sound localization.

Authors:  Erno H A Langendijk; Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech recognition in background noise: monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients.

Authors:  P Persson; H Harder; S Arlinger; B Magnuson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of forward masking on sound localization in cats: basic findings with broadband maskers.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Charles J Limb; Monita Chatterjee; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  High Oxygen Exchange to Music Indicates Auditory Distractibility in Acquired Brain Injury: An fNIRS Study with a Vector-Based Phase Analysis.

Authors:  Eunju Jeong; Hokyoung Ryu; Joon-Ho Shin; Gyu Hyun Kwon; Geonsang Jo; Ji-Yeong Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Melodic Contour Identification Reflects the Cognitive Threshold of Aging.

Authors:  Eunju Jeong; Hokyoung Ryu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.750

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.