Literature DB >> 15988595

Auditory sequence learning: differential sensitivity to task relevant and task irrelevant sequences.

B Riedel1, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

Using a serial reaction time task, this study examines whether learning of auditory sequences is possible without a corresponding motor response, i.e., by listening alone. The dual sequence paradigm used by Mayr (in Journal of the Experimental Psychology: Learning memory and cognition 22:350-354, 1996, Experiment 1) was adapted to the auditory domain. Four different actors spoke the same four colour words. These were presented such that speaker identity followed one sequence, and the word spoken followed a different sequence. Subjects were asked to respond (with a key press) to one of these dimensions (identity or word), and ignore the other. Results showed learning for either type of stimulus, but only when it was responded to. No learning of either type of auditory sequence by listening alone was found. The results add evidence to visual implicit learning studies that have failed to find learning of event sequences when spatial or response selection was not an important factor in processing. The findings are discussed in the context of implicit learning as a general and fundamental cognitive process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15988595     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0226-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  14 in total

1.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.

Authors:  D B Willingham; L A Wells; J M Farrell; M E Stemwedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

2.  Implicit learning of sequences of tasks.

Authors:  H Heuer; V Schmidtke; T Kleinsorge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.

Authors:  D B Willingham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

4.  Serial pattern learning by event observation.

Authors:  J H Howard; S A Mutter; D V Howard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.

Authors:  T A Mondor; R J Zatorre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults.

Authors:  J R Saffran; E K Johnson; R N Aslin; E L Newport
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-02-01

9.  Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task.

Authors:  D R Shanks; T Johnstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Sequence learning by action and observation: evidence for separate mechanisms.

Authors:  S W Kelly; A M Burton; B Riedel; E Lynch
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Correlation and response relevance in sequence learning.

Authors:  Josephine Cock; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Effector-related sequence learning in a bimanual-bisequential serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Michael P Berner; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-08

3.  Implicit sequence learning using auditory cues leads to modality-specific representations.

Authors:  Y Catherine Han; Paul J Reber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-20

4.  Infants are superior in implicit crossmodal learning and use other learning mechanisms than adults.

Authors:  Sophie Rohlf; Boukje Habets; Marco von Frieling; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.