Literature DB >> 10699007

Evaluation of autoSCAN-W/A and the Vitek GNI+ AutoMicrobic system for identification of non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli.

L L Sung1, D I Yang, C C Hung, H T Ho.   

Abstract

The autoSCAN-W/A (W/A; Dade Behring Microscan Inc., West Sacramento, Calif.) and Vitek AutoMicrobic System (Vitek AMS; bioMérieux Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) are both fully automated microbiology systems. We evaluated the accuracy of these two systems in identifying nonglucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli. We used the W/A with conventional-panel Neg Combo type 12 and Vitek GNI+ identification systems. A total of 301 isolates from 25 different species were tested. Of these, 299 isolates were identified in the databases of both systems. The conventional biochemical methods were used for reference. The W/A correctly identified 215 isolates (71. 4%) to the species level at initial testing with a high probability of >/=85%. The Vitek GNI+ correctly identified 216 isolates (71.8%) to the species level at initial testing with a high probability of >/=90%. After additional testing that was recommended by the manufacturer's protocol, the correct identifications of the W/A and Vitek GNI+ improved to 96.0 and 92.3%, respectively. The major misidentified species were Sphingomonas paucimobilis and Agrobacterium radiobacter in the W/A system and Acinetobacter lwoffii, Chryseobacterium indologenes, and Comamonas acidovorans in the Vitek GNI+ system. The error rates were 4.0 and 7.6%, respectively. The overall accuracy for both systems was above 90% if the supplemental tests were applied. There was no significant difference in accuracy (P > 0.05) between the two systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699007      PMCID: PMC86355     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D Sahm; C O'Hara; C Ciaglia; M Yu; N Yamane; G Scharnweber; D Rhoden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of Vitek GNI and GNI+ cards for identification of gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  P P Bourbeau; B J Heiter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems Crystal E/NF identification systems for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative, glucose-fermenting and non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.

Authors:  C M O'Hara; G L Westbrook; J M Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of autoSCAN-W/A automated microbiology system for the identification of non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  F C Tenover; T S Mizuki; L G Carlson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.

Authors:  J J Plorde; J A Gates; L G Carlson; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical and financial benefits of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J Barenfanger; C Drake; G Kacich
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  A Robinson; Y S McCarter; J Tetreault
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.

Authors:  C M O'Hara; F C Tenover; J M Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification.

Authors:  G V Doern; R Vautour; M Gaudet; B Levy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  In vitro susceptibilities of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa to 32 antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  R J Fass; J Barnishan
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Ability of the MicroScan rapid gram-negative ID type 3 panel to identify nonenteric glucose-fermenting and nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Caroline M O'Hara; J Michael Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Manual and automated instrumentation for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other aerobic gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Caroline M O'hara
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Molecular epidemiology of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa hospital outbreak driven by a contaminated disinfectant-soap dispenser.

Authors:  Simone Lanini; Silvia D'Arezzo; Vincenzo Puro; Lorena Martini; Francesco Imperi; Pierluca Piselli; Marco Montanaro; Simonetta Paoletti; Paolo Visca; Giuseppe Ippolito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Otomastoiditis caused by Sphingomonas paucimobilis: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Gabriel Nuncio Benevides; Noely Hein; Denise Swei Lo; Angela Esposito Ferronato; Selma Lopes Betta Ragazzi; Cristina Ryoka Miyao Yoshioka; Maki Hirose; Debora Morais Cardoso; Silvia Regina Dos Santos; Alfredo Elias Gilio
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2014-09-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.