Literature DB >> 7643655

Role of equalisation mammography of dense breasts.

D B Plewes1, J M Sabol, I Soutar, A Chevrier, R Shumak.   

Abstract

Parenchymal patterns characteristic of dense breasts are known to degrade the mammographic detection of small breast cancers and microcalcifications. This arises from large variations in exposure of the film, resulting in reduced image contrast over areas of suboptimal exposure. Based on sensitometric measurements of mammograms from a typical patient population, it is shown that over 60% of a typical mammogram in Wolfe's DY classification was found to be exposed suboptimally, suggesting a significant margin for improving mammography for these patients. In order to address this problem, a prototype mammographic version of scanning equalisation radiography (MSER) has been developed, which delivers a patient-specific spatially non-uniform distribution of breast exposure, adjusted to maintain optimal film exposure and contrast over the entire mammogram. Anthropomorphic phantom MSER images show a marked improvement in subjective image quality relative to conventional mammograms, while exhibiting a similar radiation risk. The detection of small microcalcifications and fibrils over clinically significant breast densities is found to be improved by factors eight and four, respectively. Such a system may be clinically practical through the use of multiple-beam equalisation methods with available X-ray tube technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7643655     DOI: 10.1007/bf02523036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  21 in total

1.  Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography.

Authors:  L Ma; E Fishell; B Wright; W Hanna; S Allan; N F Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Comparison of scanning equalization and conventional chest radiography.

Authors:  J C Wandtke; D B Plewes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.

Authors:  L J Kool; D L Busscher; H Vlasbloem; J Hermans; P C vd Merwe; P R Algra; W Herstel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A scanning system for chest radiography with regional exposure control: theoretical considerations.

Authors:  D B Plewes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A scanning system for chest radiography with regional exposure control: practical implementation.

Authors:  D B Plewes; E Vogelstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The variation of breast parenchymal patterns with age.

Authors:  G H Whitehouse; S J Leinster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Mammography in women under age 30: is there clinical benefit?

Authors:  S M Williams; P A Kaplan; J C Petersen; R P Lieberman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  J Brisson; F Merletti; N L Sadowsky; J A Twaddle; A S Morrison; P Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Observer performance and dose efficiency of mammographic scanning equalization radiography.

Authors:  J M Sabol; I C Soutar; D B Plewes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Mammographic density and physical assessment of the breast.

Authors:  C A Swann; D B Kopans; K A McCarthy; G White; D A Hall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  1 in total

1.  An interval prototype classifier based on a parameterized distance applied to breast thermographic images.

Authors:  Marcus C Araújo; Renata M C R Souza; Rita C F Lima; Telmo M Silva Filho
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.