Literature DB >> 7615593

Which primary total hip replacement?

D W Murray1, A J Carr, C J Bulstrode.   

Abstract

To assist surgeons to select a total hip replacement (THR) we present comparative information on all such implants on the market in the UK. We identified 62 different primary THRs, manufactured by 19 companies; half had been introduced in the last five years, and only 30% have any results published in peer-reviewed journals. The prices range from 250 pounds to 2000 pounds, and the two cheapest implants have the longest reported follow-up. The number of THR implants available in the UK, and presumably the rest of the world, is rapidly increasing, but there is little or no scientific evidence that the newer, more expensive, implants are better than established designs. Some will undoubtedly be worse. We believe that this situation is unsatisfactory and make recommendations for improvement, in particular that preference be given to implants with good results in published peer-reviewed long-term clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7615593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  28 in total

1.  An economic model to estimate the relative costs over 20 years of different hip prostheses.

Authors:  K Baxter; G Bevan
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Which primary shoulder and elbow replacement? A review of the results of prostheses available in the UK.

Authors:  D C Mackay; B Hudson; J R Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Revision hip arthroplasty activity in a single UK health region: an audit of 1265 cases.

Authors:  T Hassan; S Birtwistle; R A Power; W M Harper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Current attitudes to total hip replacement in the younger patient: results of a national survey.

Authors:  T D Tennent; N J Goddard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  [The cemented MS-30 stem. A multi-surgeon series of 333 consecutive cases].

Authors:  M Clauss; T Reitzel; M Pritsch; U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; V Ewerbeck; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Primary total hip replacement: variations in patient management in Oxford & Anglia, Trent, Yorkshire & Northern 'regions'.

Authors:  R W Morris; R Fitzpatrick; S Hajat; B C Reeves; D W Murray; D Hannen; M Rigge; O Williams; P J Gregg
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Are national guidelines for total hip replacement in the UK reflected in practice?

Authors:  A Abraham; L Hajipour; A R Innes; H Phillips; A W McCaskie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Current practice in primary total hip replacement: results from the National Hip Replacement Outcome Project.

Authors:  A J Best; D Fender; W M Harper; A W McCaskie; K Oliver; P J Gregg
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Joint responsibility: the need for a national arthroplasty register.

Authors:  D H Sochart; A J Long; M L Porter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-13

Review 10.  Which primary total knee replacement? A review of currently available TKR in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Y Liow; D W Murray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.