Literature DB >> 10932666

Revision hip arthroplasty activity in a single UK health region: an audit of 1265 cases.

T Hassan1, S Birtwistle, R A Power, W M Harper.   

Abstract

Revision hip arthroplasty is an operation which is steadily increasing in number and can often be technically challenging. We have utilised a regional hip register (the Trent Regional Arthroplasty Study) to analyse the epidemiology of revision hip arthroplasties in a single UK health region. The study shows that of the large number (1265) of procedures performed over a 7-year period (1991-1997), the majority were performed by general orthopaedic surgeons, with 91 different surgeons performing the operation and only two surgeons performing more than 20 procedures per year. Of more than 100 prosthetic combinations used for the procedure, the Charnley prosthesis was the most common (38.3% of acetabular revisions and 37.5% of femoral revisions). The same component was also the most commonly explanted (43%). There was an even geographical spread across the region with revision hip arthroplasty being performed in all hospitals with an orthopaedic in-patient facility. Prospective audit of this large and varied cohort is necessary to determine differences in outcome (if any) between 'specialist' hip surgeons and general orthopaedic surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10932666      PMCID: PMC2503498     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Current practice in primary total hip replacement: results from the National Hip Replacement Outcome Project.

Authors:  A J Best; D Fender; W M Harper; A W McCaskie; K Oliver; P J Gregg
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Joint responsibility: the need for a national arthroplasty register.

Authors:  D H Sochart; A J Long; M L Porter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-13

3.  Need for a national arthroplasty register. Funding is important.

Authors:  D Fender; W M Harper; P J Gregg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-19

4.  How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Which primary total hip replacement?

Authors:  D W Murray; A J Carr; C J Bulstrode
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-07

6.  Designer hips.

Authors:  C J Bulstrode; D W Murray; A J Carr; P B Pynsent; S R Carter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-20

7.  Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990.

Authors:  H Malchau; P Herberts; L Ahnfelt
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-10

8.  Relationship between the volume of total hip replacements performed by providers and the rates of postoperative complications in the state of Washington.

Authors:  H J Kreder; R A Deyo; T Koepsell; M F Swiontkowski; W Kreuter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.284

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.