Literature DB >> 11518374

Which primary shoulder and elbow replacement? A review of the results of prostheses available in the UK.

D C Mackay1, B Hudson, J R Williams.   

Abstract

To assist surgeons select a suitable prosthesis, we have undertaken a detailed review of all shoulder and elbow replacements currently marketed in the UK. Twenty shoulder and 8 elbow implants, manufactured by 16 companies, have been identified. Twelve of the shoulder and one of the elbow implants have been introduced or modified in the last 8 years and have no clinical results published in peer-reviewed journals. Only the Biomodular, Bipolar, Copeland, Isoelastic, Neer hemi, Neer II, Roper-Day and Select shoulders accounting for less than 40% of the UK shoulder market, possess published results. The Capitello-condylar, Coonrad-Morrey, GSB III, Kudo, Liverpool, Roper-Tuke and Souter-Strathclyde elbows all have published results. These account for over 95% of all UK elbow replacements. The implications of these findings in an era of evidence-based medicine is discussed. Reviewing the clinical results should be of primary importance in the selection of a suitable prosthesis. Implants with a proven long-term record must represent the 'gold standard'. New or modified implants should only be used if they are part of a properly conducted clinical trial.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11518374      PMCID: PMC2503388     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  18 in total

1.  Survivorship and radiological analysis of the standard Souter-Strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  I A Trail; D Nuttall; J K Stanley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-01

2.  The Roper-Day total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  B A Roper; J M Paterson; W H Day
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-07

3.  Long-term results of the GSB III elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  N Gschwend; N H Scheier; A R Baehler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-11

Review 4.  Which primary total hip replacement?

Authors:  D W Murray; A J Carr; C J Bulstrode
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-07

5.  Survival analysis of joint replacements.

Authors:  D W Murray; A J Carr; C Bulstrode
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09

6.  The modified Liverpool total elbow prosthesis.

Authors:  S Dhar; F H Beddow
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1994-04

7.  Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Indications for glenoid resurfacing.

Authors:  A D Boyd; W H Thomas; R D Scott; C B Sledge; T S Thornhill
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992.

Authors:  K Knutson; S Lewold; O Robertsson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1994-08

9.  Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term results.

Authors:  F C Ewald; E D Simmons; J A Sullivan; W H Thomas; R D Scott; R Poss; T S Thornhill; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  J T Ruth; A H Wilde
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of primary total elbow prostheses used for the rheumatoid elbow.

Authors:  J C T van der Lugt; P M Rozing
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Cementation technique for elbow arthroplasty; an international survey.

Authors:  Tariq A Kwaees; Rohit Singhal; Denise Eygendaal; Charalambos P Charalambous
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-07-01

3.  Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study.

Authors:  Roopam Dey; Steven Roche; Theo Rosch; Tinashe Mutsvangwa; Johan Charilaou; Sudesh Sivarasu
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.