Literature DB >> 16551395

Are national guidelines for total hip replacement in the UK reflected in practice?

A Abraham1, L Hajipour, A R Innes, H Phillips, A W McCaskie.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A cross-sectional study was performed to compare the practice of total hip replacement (THR) in the UK against national guidelines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all fellows of the British Orthopaedic Association.
RESULTS: Of the 1587 questionnaires sent out, 966 (60.9%) were returned. Of these, 706 (73.1%) were available for data collection and analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was observed in several areas including the use of pre-admission clinics and modern cementing techniques. Facilities deemed necessary for THR surgery such as HDU/ITU back-up, ultra-clean air and dedicated orthopaedic wards are almost universally available. However, a lack of consensus is evident in many areas including the process of obtaining written consent, thrombo-embolic prophylaxis, duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, supervision of trainee surgeons and follow-up arrangements. The proliferation in the range of implants, particularly aimed at 'younger' patients, available to surgeons has once again been highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16551395      PMCID: PMC1964041          DOI: 10.1308/003588406X82943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  14 in total

1.  The economics of preventing revisions in total hip replacement.

Authors:  U Persson; M Persson; H Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-04

2.  The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review.

Authors:  R D Mulroy; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-09

3.  Current attitudes to total hip replacement in the younger patient: results of a national survey.

Authors:  T D Tennent; N J Goddard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Which primary total hip replacement?

Authors:  D W Murray; A J Carr; C J Bulstrode
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-07

Review 5.  Prevention of infection in the 1990s.

Authors:  I D Learmonth
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and total hip replacement.

Authors:  D W Murray; A J Carr; C J Bulstrode
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-01

7.  Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990.

Authors:  H Malchau; P Herberts; L Ahnfelt
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-10

8.  Influence of an anaesthetist on nurse-led, computer-based, pre-operative assessment.

Authors:  P K Barnes; P A Emerson; S Hajnal; W J Radford; J Congleton
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Venous leg ulcers after hip replacement. A clinical evaluation at 5 to 12 years.

Authors:  J S Mehta; N Nicolaou; S Kiryluk; M J F Fordyce
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

10.  Death and thromboembolic disease after total hip replacement. A series of 1162 cases with no routine chemical prophylaxis.

Authors:  D Warwick; M H Williams; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Preoperative grip strength measurement and duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A J Shyam Kumar; N Beresford-Cleary; P Kumar; A Barai; N Vasukutty; S Yasin; A Sinha
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-08-29

2.  Virtual arthroplasty follow-up: five-year data from a district general hospital.

Authors:  R Fisher; V Hamilton; S Reader; F Khatun; M Porteous
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Cost analysis on virtual clinic follow-up after primary joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vinay Joseph; Mathias T Nagy; James Fountain
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.