Literature DB >> 7580556

Improving oral examinations: selecting, training, and monitoring examiners for the MRCGP. Royal College of General Practitioners.

R Wakeford1, L Southgate, V Wass.   

Abstract

Unless examiners are carefully selected, trained, and monitored, examinations may become haphazard. This is perhaps most true of oral or viva voce ("viva") examinations, which can generate marks unrelated to competence. To help other bodies to short circuit some years of experiment in connection with the oral component of the Royal College of General Practitioners' membership examination (MRCGP), this paper describes the selection, training, guidance, and monitoring arrangements that have been developed.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7580556      PMCID: PMC2550925          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7010.931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  5 in total

1.  Correcting performance-rating errors in oral examinations.

Authors:  M R Raymond; L C Webb; W M Houston
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Interviews in the selection of partners, trainees and medical students.

Authors:  D Pendleton; R Wakeford
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-04

3.  The oral examination: a study of academic and non-academic factors.

Authors:  C S Thomas; G Mellsop; K Callender; J Crawshaw; P M Ellis; A Hall; J MacDonald; P Silfverskiold; S Romans-Clarkson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Short answer questions in an undergraduate qualifying examination: a study of examiner variability.

Authors:  R E Wakeford; S Roberts
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinations.

Authors:  D I Newble; J Hoare; P F Sheldrake
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 6.251

  5 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  Oral examinations-equal opportunities, ethnicity, and fairness in the MRCGP.

Authors:  C Roberts; S Sarangi; L Southgate; R Wakeford; V Wass
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-05

2.  A Case for Caution: Chart-Stimulated Recall.

Authors:  Shalini T Reddy; Justin Endo; Shanu Gupta; Ara Tekian; Yoon Soo Park
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  How should paediatric examiners be trained?

Authors:  N Khera; H Davies; H Davies; T Lissauer; D Skuse; R Wakeford; J Stroobant
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  What is being assessed in the MRCGP oral examination? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Robin G Simpson; Karen D Ballard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Prevalence of the insulin resistance syndrome in obesity.

Authors:  R M Viner; T Y Segal; E Lichtarowicz-Krynska; P Hindmarsh
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Introduction of Structured Oral Examination as A Novel Assessment tool to First Year Medical Students in Physiology.

Authors:  Mrunal R Shenwai; Krishnakant B Patil
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-11-10

7.  Refining the MRCGP.

Authors:  D Haslam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Recent developments in assessing medical students.

Authors:  S L Fowell; J G Bligh
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Assessment of competence.

Authors:  L M Campbell; T S Murray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Assessment of specialist registrars in A&E--opportunities for change.

Authors:  K Reynard; A McGowan
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1997-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.