Literature DB >> 15613510

How should paediatric examiners be trained?

N Khera1, H Davies, H Davies, T Lissauer, D Skuse, R Wakeford, J Stroobant.   

Abstract

Analysis of both the content and process of examinations is central to planning the appropriate education and training of examiners in paediatric clinical examinations. This paper discusses the case for developing training, reviews the current literature, and suggests the desirable attributes of examiners and the components of a training programme. Potential areas of further research are also considered.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15613510      PMCID: PMC1720079          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2004.055103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  24 in total

1.  Evidence based policy: proceed with care.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

2.  Training the ideal hospital doctor: the specialist registrars' perspective.

Authors:  N Khera; J Stroobant; R A Primhak; R Gupta; H Davies
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Objectivity in objective structured clinical examinations: checklists are no substitute for examiner commitment.

Authors:  Tim J Wilkinson; Christopher M Frampton; Mark Thompson-Fawcett; Tony Egan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Effect of ethnicity on performance in a final objective structured clinical examination: qualitative and quantitative study.

Authors:  Val Wass; Celia Roberts; Ron Hoogenboom; Roger Jones; Cees Van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

5.  How do examiners decide?: a qualitative study of the process of decision making in the oral examination component of the MRCGP examination.

Authors:  John Yaphe; Simon Street
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations.

Authors:  David Newble
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Training and experience of examiners.

Authors:  C P van der Vleuten; S J van Luyk; A M van Ballegooijen; D B Swanson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Examination of clinical examiners.

Authors:  G M Wilson; R Lever; R M Harden; J I Robertson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1969-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A study of the reliability of the clinical oral examination in psychiatry.

Authors:  P Leichner; G C Sisler; D Harper
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.356

10.  The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinations.

Authors:  D I Newble; J Hoare; P F Sheldrake
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors associated with success in the oral part of the European Diploma in Intensive Care.

Authors:  Petr Waldauf; Francesca Rubulotta; Christian Sitzwohl; Paul Elbers; Armand Girbes; Rajnish Saha; Brian Marsh; Ravindra Kumar; Marco Maggiorini; František Duška
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-07-05

2.  The Final Oral/Practical State Examination at Freiburg Medical Faculty in 2012--Analysis of grading to test quality assurance.

Authors:  Angela Schickler; Peter Brüstle; Silke Biller
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  Peer feedback for examiner quality assurance on MRCGP International South Asia: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  D P Perera; Marie Andrades; Val Wass
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.