Literature DB >> 8945803

Assessment of competence.

L M Campbell1, T S Murray.   

Abstract

While it is essential that professional competence should be maintained, it is equally important that entry to the specialist ranks should be conditional on the demonstration of an acceptable level of competence. Multiple-choice papers and videotaped consultations are two parts of a multi-format approach to assessment which also includes a trainer's report and an audit report. The number of doctors identified as unsatisfactory at the recertification stage could be reduced by these methods, and the system could also provide a template for the introduction of recertification procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8945803      PMCID: PMC1239790     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  30 in total

1.  Relationships between clinical competence ratings and examination performance.

Authors:  F J Dowaliby; B J Andrew
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1976-03

2.  Consensus minimum standards for use in a trainer's report for summative assessment in general practice.

Authors:  N Johnson; J Hasler; J Toby; J Grant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Assessment of general practice consultations: content validity of a rating scale.

Authors:  R B Hays
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Reliability and learning from the objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  J Roberts; G Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Analysis of videotaped consultations to certify competence.

Authors:  R B Hays; B F Jones; P B Adkins; P J McKain
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1990-06-04       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  D I Newble; D B Swanson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Video recording in general practice: the patients do mind.

Authors:  J B Servant; J A Matheson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-12

8.  Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence.

Authors:  J J Norcini; D B Swanson; L J Grosso; G D Webster
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence?

Authors:  J E Herbers; G L Noel; G S Cooper; J Harvey; L N Pangaro; M J Weaver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Direct, standardized assessment of clinical competence.

Authors:  R G Williams; H S Barrows; N V Vu; S J Verhulst; J A Colliver; M Marcy; D Steward
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  5 in total

1.  Expanding the role of the family history in primary care.

Authors:  J Emery; P Rose
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Revalidation.

Authors:  M Pringle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  [Dilemmas and alternatives in the evaluation of family doctor training].

Authors:  J R Loayssa Lara
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Summative assessment of vocational training: to be required by law.

Authors:  D Pereira Gray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Comparison of video-recorded consultations with those in which patients' consent is withheld.

Authors:  T Coleman; T Manku-Scott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.