Literature DB >> 7484286

Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.

M Jergas1, M Breitenseher, C C Glüer, W Yu, H K Genant.   

Abstract

To determine whether estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional scans of the lumbar spine have weaker associations with height and weight and stronger associations with prevalent vertebral fractures than standard projectional bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC), we obtained posteroanterior (PA) dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), lateral supine DXA (Hologic QDR 2000), and quantitative computed tomography (QCT, GE 9800 scanner) in 260 postmenopausal women enrolled in two trials of treatment for osteoporosis. In 223 women, all vertebral levels, i.e., L2-L4 in the DXA scan and L1-L3 in the QCT scan, could be evaluated. Fifty-five women were diagnosed as having at least one mild fracture (age 67.9 +/- 6.5 years) and 168 women did not have any fractures (age 62.3 +/- 6.9 years). We derived three estimates of "volumetric bone density" from PA DXA (BMAD, BMAD*, and BMD*) and three from paired PA and lateral DXA (WA BMD, WA BMDHol, and eVBMD). While PA BMC and PA BMD were significantly correlated with height (r = 0.49 and r = 0.28) or weight (r = 0.38 and r = 0.37), QCT and the volumetric bone density estimates from paired PA and lateral scans were not (r = -0.083 to r = 0.050). BMAD, BMAD*, and BMD* correlated with weight but not height. The associations with vertebral fracture were stronger for QCT (odds ratio [QR] = 3.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.90-5.27), eVBMD (OR = 2.87; CI 1.80-4.57), WA BMDHol (OR = 2.86; CI 1.80-4.55) and WA-BMD (OR = 2.77; CI 1.75-4.39) than for BMAD*/BMD* (OR = 2.03; CI 1.32-3.12), BMAD (OR = 1.68; CI 1.14-2.48), lateral BMD (OR = 1.88; CI 1.28-2.77), standard PA BMD (OR = 1.47; CI 1.02-2.13) or PA BMC (OR = 1.22; CI 0.86-1.74). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for QCT and all estimates of volumetric BMD were significantly higher compared with standard PA BMD and PA BMC. We conclude that, like QCT, estimates of volumetric bone density from paired PA and lateral scans are unaffected by height and weight and are more strongly associated with vertebral fracture than standard PA BMD or BMC, or estimates of volumetric density that are solely based on PA DXA scans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7484286     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  21 in total

1.  Mechanical loading during growth is associated with plane-specific differences in vertebral geometry: A cross-sectional analysis comparing artistic gymnasts vs. non-gymnasts.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Paula F Rosenbaum; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device.

Authors:  S Kolta; A Le Bras; D Mitton; V Bousson; J A de Guise; J Fechtenbaum; J D Laredo; C Roux; W Skalli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The ratio of anterior and posterior vertebral heights reinforces the utility of DXA in assessment of vertebrae strength.

Authors:  Grzegorz Tatoń; Eugeniusz Rokita; Mariusz Korkosz; Andrzej Wróbel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image.

Authors:  C M Langton; S Pisharody; J H Keyak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Tarsal and metatarsal bone mineral density measurement using volumetric quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul K Commean; Tao Ju; Lu Liu; David R Sinacore; Mary K Hastings; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  In vivo 3D reconstruction of human vertebrae with the three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA) method.

Authors:  S Kolta; S Quiligotti; A Ruyssen-Witrand; A Amido; D Mitton; A Le Bras; W Skalli; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Susan Kantor; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; John D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Weight, body composition, and bone density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S S Harris; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: a comparison with posteroanterior spine, hip and total-body DXA.

Authors:  G M Blake; R J Herd; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Osteoporosis in a female population from Bratislava--age-related BMD changes.

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová; Viera Pacáková
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.