Literature DB >> 21839871

Mechanical loading during growth is associated with plane-specific differences in vertebral geometry: A cross-sectional analysis comparing artistic gymnasts vs. non-gymnasts.

Jodi N Dowthwaite1, Paula F Rosenbaum, Tamara A Scerpella.   

Abstract

Lumbar spine geometry, density and indices of bone strength were assessed relative to menarche status, using artistic gymnastics exposure during growth as a model of mechanical loading. Paired posteroanterior (pa) and supine lateral (lat) DXA scans of L3 for 114 females (60 ex/gymnasts and 54 non-gymnasts) yielded output for comparison of paired (palat) versus standard pa and lat outcomes. BMC, areal BMD, vertebral body dimensions, bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), axial compressive strength (IBS) and a fracture risk index were evaluated, modeling vertebral body geometry as an ellipsoid cylinder. Two-factor ANCOVA tested statistical effects of gymnastic exposure, menarche status and their interaction, adjusting for age and height as appropriate. Compared to non-gymnasts, ex/gymnasts exhibited greater paBMD, paBMC, paWidth, pa Cross-sectional area (CSA), paVolume, latBMD, latBMAD, palatCSA and palatIBS (p<0.05). Non-gymnasts exhibited greater latDepth/paWidth, latBMC/paBMC, latVHeight, latArea and Fracture Risk Index. Using ellipsoid vertebral geometric models, no significant differences were detected for pa or palat BMAD. In contrast, cuboid model results (Carter et al., 1992) suggested erroneous ex/gymnast paBMAD advantages, resulting from invalid assumptions of proportional variation in linear skeletal dimensions. Gymnastic exposure was associated with shorter, wider vertebral bodies, yielding greater axial compressive strength and lower fracture risk, despite no BMAD advantage. Our results suggest the importance of plane-specific vertebral geometric adaptation to mechanical loading during growth. Paired scan output provides a more accurate assessment of this adaptation than pa or lat plane scans alone.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21839871      PMCID: PMC3200503          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  44 in total

1.  Bone density, body composition and menstrual history of sedentary female former gymnasts, aged 20-32 years.

Authors:  C L Zanker; C Osborne; C B Cooke; B Oldroyd; J G Truscott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Evidence of sustained skeletal benefits from impact-loading exercise in young females: a 3-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jaana A Nurmi-Lawton; Adam D Baxter-Jones; Robert L Mirwald; Jacki A Bishop; Patricia Taylor; Cyrus Cooper; Susan A New
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data.

Authors:  D R Carter; M L Bouxsein; R Marcus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Dose related association of impact activity and bone mineral density in pre-pubertal girls.

Authors:  T A Scerpella; M Davenport; C M Morganti; J A Kanaley; L M Johnson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures.

Authors:  E Seeman; Y Duan; C Fong; J Edmonds
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss.

Authors:  Y Duan; C H Turner; B T Kim; E Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Lateral dual-energy radiography: artifact error from rib and pelvic bone.

Authors:  R C Rupich; M G Griffin; R Pacifici; L V Avioli; N Susman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Relative contribution of vertebral body and posterior arch in female and male lumbar spine peak bone mass.

Authors:  P E Fournier; R Rizzoli; D O Slosman; B Buchs; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. Mechanical implications and relationship to fractures.

Authors:  V Gilsanz; M L Loro; T F Roe; J Sayre; R Gilsanz; E E Schulz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Gymnasts exhibit higher bone mass than runners despite similar prevalence of amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea.

Authors:  T L Robinson; C Snow-Harter; D R Taaffe; D Gillis; J Shaw; R Marcus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  13 in total

1.  The ratio of anterior and posterior vertebral heights reinforces the utility of DXA in assessment of vertebrae strength.

Authors:  Grzegorz Tatoń; Eugeniusz Rokita; Mariusz Korkosz; Andrzej Wróbel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Age estimation in competitive sports.

Authors:  Maximilian Timme; Jürgen Michael Steinacker; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 3.  Vertebral cross-sectional area: an orphan phenotype with potential implications for female spinal health.

Authors:  T A L Wren; S Ponrartana; V Gilsanz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effects of Gymnastics Activities on Bone Accrual during Growth: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaak Jürimäe; Rita Gruodyte-Raciene; Adam D G Baxter-Jones
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  The Influence of Organized Physical Activity (Including Gymnastics) on Young Adult Skeletal Traits: Is Maturity Phase Important?

Authors:  Brittney Bernardoni; Tamara A Scerpella; Paula F Rosenbaum; Jill A Kanaley; Lindsay N Raab; Quefeng Li; Sijian Wang; Jodi N Dowthwaite
Journal:  Pediatr Exerc Sci       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.333

6.  Sexual Dimorphism in Newborn Vertebrae and Its Potential Implications.

Authors:  Skorn Ponrartana; Patricia C Aggabao; Naga L Dharmavaram; Carissa L Fisher; Philippe Friedlich; Sherin U Devaskar; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 7.  Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya A L Wren; Skorn Ponrartana; Stefano Mora; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Site-specific, adult bone benefits attributed to loading during youth: A preliminary longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Tamara A Scerpella; Brittney Bernardoni; Sijian Wang; Paul J Rathouz; Quefeng Li; Jodi N Dowthwaite
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  A 2-yr, School-Based Resistance Exercise Pilot Program Increases Bone Accrual in Adolescent Girls.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Deena M Weiss; Jill Thein-Nissenbaum; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  Transl J Am Coll Sports Med       Date:  2019-06

10.  Combining areal DXA bone mineral density and vertebrae postero-anterior width improves the prediction of vertebral strength.

Authors:  Grzegorz Tatoń; Eugeniusz Rokita; Andrzej Wróbel; Mariusz Korkosz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.