Literature DB >> 8939766

Weight, body composition, and bone density in postmenopausal women.

S S Harris1, B Dawson-Hughes.   

Abstract

Associations of body weight and body composition with bone mineral density (BMD) were examined in 261 postmenopausal women. BMD, body fat, and body nonfat soft tissue (NFST) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A height-independent BMD variable (HIBMD) was calculated to correct for differences among individuals in bone thickness, a dimension that is ignored by DXA scanners. HIBMD was calculated as BMD divided by height at the spine and femoral neck, and BMD divided by the square root of height at the total body. Weight, fat, and nonfat soft tissue were all positively correlated with both BMD and HIBMD, but the magnitudes of regression and correlation coefficients were lower when HIBMD was the dependent variable. The weight-independent associations of body composition with HIBMD were examined by including weight and % NFST together in linear models. In these analyses, weight was positively associated with HIBMD at all three skeletal sites (r = 0.22-0.26, P < 0.05), % NFST was not associated with HIBMD at the spine or femoral neck (r = 0.01-0.02), and there was only a weak inverse correlation of % NFST with total body BMD (r = -0.12, P < 0.05). These findings are consistent with those of previous studies demonstrating positive associations between body weight and BMD. In addition, they demonstrate that once bone thickness and body weight are taken into account, body composition appears to have little if any independent effect on bone density at the skeletal sites measured. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that the protective effect of body weight is brought about predominantly through its mechanical force on the skeleton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8939766     DOI: 10.1007/bf00369205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  31 in total

1.  Bone mass and anthropometric measurements in adult females.

Authors:  C W Slemenda; S L Hui; C J Williams; J C Christian; F J Meaney; C C Johnston
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1990-10

2.  New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data.

Authors:  D R Carter; M L Bouxsein; R Marcus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  J Johnson; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  The assessment of historical physical activity and its relation to adult bone parameters.

Authors:  A M Kriska; R B Sandler; J A Cauley; R E LaPorte; D L Hom; G Pambianco
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Body weight versus body fat distribution, adiposity, and frame size as predictors of bone density.

Authors:  H S Glauber; W M Vollmer; M C Nevitt; K E Ensrud; E S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis.

Authors:  N F Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Uncritical use of bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants.

Authors:  A Prentice; T J Parsons; T J Cole
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Relation between body size and bone mineral density in elderly men and women.

Authors:  S L Edelstein; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Body composition and bone mass in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  J E Compston; M Bhambhani; M A Laskey; S Murphy; K T Khaw
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.478

View more
  13 in total

1.  Adjusting data to body size: a comparison of methods as applied to quantitative trait loci analysis of musculoskeletal phenotypes.

Authors:  Dean H Lang; Neil A Sharkey; Arimantas Lionikas; Holly A Mack; Lars Larsson; George P Vogler; David J Vandenbergh; David A Blizard; Joseph T Stout; Joseph P Stitt; Gerald E McClearn
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Reciprocal relations of subcutaneous and visceral fat to bone structure and strength.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; James Chalfant; Ashley O Mo; David C Lee; Frederick J Dorey; Steven D Mittelman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Structural equation modeling of the relationship of bone mineral density and its risk factors in Japanese women.

Authors:  S Toyokawa; H Nishikawa; M Ueji; K Motegi; K Kano
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Overweight postmenopausal women lose bone with moderate weight reduction and 1 g/day calcium intake.

Authors:  Claudia S Riedt; Mariana Cifuentes; Theodore Stahl; Hasina A Chowdhury; Yvette Schlussel; Sue A Shapses
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Association analyses of RANKL/RANK/OPG gene polymorphisms with femoral neck compression strength index variation in Caucasians.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Dong; Xiao-Gang Liu; Yuan Chen; Yan Guo; Liang Wang; Jian Zhao; Dong-Hai Xiong; Xiang-Hong Xu; Robert R Recker; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Relationship between body composition and bone mineral density in women with and without osteoporosis: relative contribution of lean and fat mass.

Authors:  Saverio Gnudi; Emanuela Sitta; Nicoletta Fiumi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Association analyses of vitamin D-binding protein gene with compression strength index variation in Caucasian nuclear families.

Authors:  X-H Xu; D-H Xiong; X-G Liu; Y Guo; Y Chen; J Zhao; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Premenopausal overweight women do not lose bone during moderate weight loss with adequate or higher calcium intake.

Authors:  Claudia S Riedt; Yvette Schlussel; Nancy von Thun; Hasina Ambia-Sobhan; Theodore Stahl; M Paul Field; Robert M Sherrell; Sue A Shapses
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  A Study of Risk Factors and T- Score Variability in Romanian Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Rodica TöRöK-Oance
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Relationship of body composition, knee extensor strength, and standing balance to lumbar bone mineral density in postmenopausal females.

Authors:  Seungsub Shin; Kyeongjin Lee; Changho Song
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.