Literature DB >> 24854155

The ratio of anterior and posterior vertebral heights reinforces the utility of DXA in assessment of vertebrae strength.

Grzegorz Tatoń1, Eugeniusz Rokita, Mariusz Korkosz, Andrzej Wróbel.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to introduce a new parameter describing bone strength with greater precision than the widely used antero-posterior DXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), which measures areal bone mineral density (aBMD). The adjusted areal bone mineral density (AaBMD) defined as the ratio between aBMD and h a/h p (h a and h p: anterior and posterior vertebral body heights measured on the lateral view, respectively) is proposed: AaBMD = aBMD/(h a/h p). The utility of AaBMD in prediction of bone strength was assessed by in vitro measurements of cadaver L3 vertebrae. The AaBMD of 31 vertebrae was correlated with the ultimate stress (P max) and load (F max) values obtained in mechanical tests. The correlations were compared to those obtained for aBMD and for volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measured by computed tomography. The correlation of AaBMD to F max adjusted for donor's age was significantly higher than for aBMD and vBMD (r = 0.740, 0.658, and 0.609, respectively, p < 0.05). The differences between partial correlation coefficients for P max to AaBMD, aBMD and vBMD relationships were smaller (r = 0.764, 0.720, and 0.732, respectively, p < 0.05), but also showed the superiority of AaBMD. Combining antero-posterior DXA aBMD and the lateral h a/h p ratio, measured, for example, by the Vertebral Fracture Assessment software of the new generation of DXA devices, seems to accurately predict the mechanical vertebral parameters related to bone strength. It is assumed that the proposed AaBMD parameter may be more predictive for fracture risk assessment, which requires further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24854155      PMCID: PMC4104001          DOI: 10.1007/s00223-014-9868-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  35 in total

1.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Mechanical loading during growth is associated with plane-specific differences in vertebral geometry: A cross-sectional analysis comparing artistic gymnasts vs. non-gymnasts.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Paula F Rosenbaum; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  New dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry equipment in the assessment of vertebral fractures: technical limits and software accuracy.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano; Giuseppe Battista; Ugo Albisinni; Cristina Rossi; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.

Authors:  E Dall'Ara; D Pahr; P Varga; F Kainberger; P Zysset
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Age-related changes in vertebral height ratios and vertebral fracture.

Authors:  T Sone; T Tomomitsu; M Miyake; N Takeda; M Fukunaga
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound.

Authors:  X G Cheng; P H Nicholson; S Boonen; G Lowet; P Brys; J Aerssens; G Van der Perre; J Dequeker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Height adjustment in assessing dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mass and density in children.

Authors:  Babette S Zemel; Mary B Leonard; Andrea Kelly; Joan M Lappe; Vicente Gilsanz; Sharon Oberfield; Soroosh Mahboubi; John A Shepherd; Thomas N Hangartner; Margaret M Frederick; Karen K Winer; Heidi J Kalkwarf
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Vertebral dimensions as risk factor of vertebral fracture in osteoporotic patients: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  A Ruyssen-Witrand; L Gossec; S Kolta; M Dougados; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Application of geometrical measurements in the assessment of vertebral strength.

Authors:  Grzegorz Tatoń; Eugeniusz Rokita; Andrzej Wróbel
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2013-04

Review 10.  Treatment of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  J-M Kaufman; J-Y Reginster; S Boonen; M L Brandi; C Cooper; W Dere; J-P Devogelaer; A Diez-Perez; J A Kanis; E McCloskey; B Mitlak; E Orwoll; J D Ringe; G Weryha; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.