Literature DB >> 25561538

Context-dependent categorical perception in a songbird.

Robert F Lachlan1, Stephen Nowicki2.   

Abstract

Some of the psychological abilities that underlie human speech are shared with other species. One hallmark of speech is that linguistic context affects both how speech sounds are categorized into phonemes, and how different versions of phonemes are produced. We here confirm earlier findings that swamp sparrows categorically perceive the notes that constitute their learned songs and then investigate how categorical boundaries differ according to context. We clustered notes according to their acoustic structure, and found statistical evidence for clustering into 10 population-wide note types. Examining how three related types were perceived, we found, in both discrimination and labeling tests, that an "intermediate" note type is categorized with a "short" type when it occurs at the beginning of a song syllable, but with a "long" type at the end of a syllable. In sum, three produced note-type clusters appear to be underlain by two perceived categories. Thus, in birdsong, as in human speech, categorical perception is context-dependent, and as is the case for human phonology, there is a complex relationship between underlying categorical representations and surface forms. Our results therefore suggest that complex phonology can evolve even in the absence of rich linguistic components, like syntax and semantics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bird song; categorical perception; phonology; speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25561538      PMCID: PMC4330770          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1410844112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

Review 1.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs.

Authors:  A T Baugh; K L Akre; M J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Are there species-universal categories in bird song phonology and syntax? A comparative study of chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs), zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata), and swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana).

Authors:  R F Lachlan; L Verhagen; S Peters; C Ten Cate
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Typical versions of learned swamp sparrow song types are more effective signals than are less typical versions.

Authors:  R F Lachlan; R C Anderson; S Peters; W A Searcy; S Nowicki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The search for phonology in other species.

Authors:  Moira J Yip
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels?

Authors:  P Marler
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.548

7.  Adult and infant perception of two English phones.

Authors:  J E Pegg; J F Werker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica).

Authors:  A J Lotto; K R Kluender; L L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech.

Authors:  Johan J Bolhuis; Kazuo Okanoya; Constance Scharff
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Neural correlates of categorical perception in learned vocal communication.

Authors:  Jonathan F Prather; Stephen Nowicki; Rindy C Anderson; Susan Peters; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  11 in total

1.  Birds tune in to sequential information when categorizing their songs.

Authors:  Julia Fischer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Zebra finches are sensitive to combinations of temporally distributed features in a model of word recognition.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Knowles; Allison J Doupe; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Capacities and neural mechanisms for auditory statistical learning across species.

Authors:  Jennifer K Schiavo; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Toward a Computational Neuroethology of Vocal Communication: From Bioacoustics to Neurophysiology, Emerging Tools and Future Directions.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Marvin Thielk; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Experimental Evidence for Phonemic Contrasts in a Nonhuman Vocal System.

Authors:  Sabrina Engesser; Jodie M S Crane; James L Savage; Andrew F Russell; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Statistical learning in songbirds: from self-tutoring to song culture.

Authors:  Olga Fehér; Iva Ljubičić; Kenta Suzuki; Kazuo Okanoya; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Cultural conformity generates extremely stable traditions in bird song.

Authors:  Robert F Lachlan; Oliver Ratmann; Stephen Nowicki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Higher-Order Musical Temporal Structure in Bird Song.

Authors:  Hans T Bilger; Emily Vertosick; Andrew Vickers; Konrad Kaczmarek; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-25

10.  Can a bird brain do phonology?

Authors:  Bridget D Samuels
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.