Literature DB >> 6832542

Predictive value of a diagnosis of colonic polyp on the double-contrast barium enema.

D J Ott, D S Ablin, D W Gelfand, I Meschan.   

Abstract

The positive predictive value of a diagnosis of colonic polyp on the double-contrast barium enema was determined by analyzing 160 polypoid lesions reported in 105 patients. Of the 160 polyps, 139 were confirmed by endoscopy, surgery, or repeat barium enema for a positive predictive value of 87%. Twenty-one lesions were not confirmed despite repeat endoscopy, repeat barium enema, review of the original study, or surgery, giving a false positive rate of 13%. The individual false positive error rates of 5 radiologists ranged from 8% to 26%. False positive errors were due to stool, diverticula, air bubbles, misinterpretation of the ileocecal valve, and haustration. Many of the false positive errors appeared to have been avoidable if the original examination had been more meticulously interpreted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6832542     DOI: 10.1007/BF01948093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  27 in total

1.  DIFFERENTIATION OF TRUE POLYPOID TUMORS OF THE COLON FROM EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL: A NEW ROENTGEN SIGN.

Authors:  J E YOUKER; S WELIN
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of barium enema nad colonoscopy in the detection of small colonic polyps.

Authors:  R F Thoeni; L Menuck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Colonoscopy in the management of colon polyps.

Authors:  C B Williams; R H Hunt; H Loose; R H Riddell; Y Sakai; E T Swarbrick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Detection of colon carcinoma and the barium enema.

Authors:  R E Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema: emphasis on polyp detection.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; W C Wu; R M Kerr
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Resolution of radiographic-endoscopic discrepancies in colon neoplasms.

Authors:  P J Weyman; R E Koehler; G R Zuckerman
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Progress in radiology: colorectal tumors: pathology and detection.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. II. Barium enema examination.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; N A Ramquist
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1980-04-30

9.  Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception.

Authors:  F M Kelvin; R Gardiner; W Vas; G W Stevenson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.