Literature DB >> 14677212

Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women.

Jennifer L Hay1, Jennifer S Ford, David Klein, Louis H Primavera, Tamara R Buckley, Traci R Stein, Moshe Shike, Jamie S Ostroff.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Screening can prevent the development of CRC or diagnose early disease when it can effectively be cured, however existing screening methods are underutilized. In this study, we examined the utility of an updated Health Belief Model to explain CRC screening adherence. The present study included 280 older women seeking routine mammography at a large, urban breast diagnostic facility. Overall, 50% of women were adherent to CRC screening guidelines. Multiple regression indicated that self-efficacy, physician recommendation, perceived benefits of and perceived barriers to screening accounted for 40% of variance in CRC screening adherence. However, there was no evidence for two mediational models with perceived benefits and perceived barriers as the primary mechanisms driving adherence to CRC screening. These findings may inform both future theoretical investigations as well as clinical interventions designed to increase CRC screening behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14677212     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026253802962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  58 in total

1.  Factors associated with perceived risk in automotive employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S W Vernon; R E Myers; B C Tilley; S Li
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  The knowledge and use of screening tests for colorectal and prostate cancer: data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  M L Brown; A L Potosky; G B Thompson; L G Kessler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  S J Blalock; B M DeVellis; R A Afifi; R S Sandler
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

5.  Trends in screening for colorectal cancer--United States, 1997 and 1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Participation of high-risk subjects in colon cancer screening.

Authors:  R S Sandler; B M DeVellis; S J Blalock; K L Holland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  S J Winawer; B J Flehinger; D Schottenfeld; D G Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R E Myers; E Ross; C Jepson; T Wolf; A Balshem; L Millner; H Leventhal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Disgusted, embarrassed, annoyed: affective associations relate to uptake of colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Lina Jandorf; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-08

3.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance among urban Hispanics.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

4.  Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-15

5.  Colorectal cancer screening among underserved Korean Americans in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Angela M Jo; Annette E Maxwell; Weng K Wong; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2008-04

6.  Acceptance of colonoscopy requires more than test tolerance.

Authors:  Amanda Condon; Lesley Graff; Lawrence Elliot; Alexandra Ilnyckyj
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 7.  Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Talya Salz; Kaitlin K Touza; Yuelin Li; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

8.  Interactions among physicians, patients, and first-degree relatives in the familial screening of colorectal cancer in France.

Authors:  Isabelle Ingrand; Sarah Dujoncquoy; Virginie Migeot; Véronique Ghadi; Michel Beauchant; Pierre Ingrand
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Correlates and geographic patterns of knowledge that physical activity decreases cancer risk.

Authors:  A Susana Ramírez; Lila J Finney Rutten; Robin C Vanderpool; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2013-04

10.  Recruiting patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: strategies and challenges across 5 sites.

Authors:  Jennifer E Boehm; Elizabeth A Rohan; Judith Preissle; Amy DeGroff; Rebecca Glover-Kudon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.