Literature DB >> 20473367

Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Zhengrong Liang1, Robert Richards.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: The high prevalence of colon carcinoma combined with the low compliance of currently recommended screening guidelines explains the continued high mortality rate of colon cancer. Utilizing a strategy of virtual colonoscopy (VC) in asymptomatic patients over 50, with optical colonoscopy (OC) follow-up for removal of detected adenomatous polyps may result in lowering the colon cancer death rate. However, the screening potential of VC has not yet been widely recognized. Debates and doubts of its potential benefits have been frequently seen in the literature since VC was first reported in 1994. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: This article reviews the currently available screening options and discuss their advantages and drawbacks. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: VC has many advantages over the existing screening options and its several drawbacks can be mitigated so that it would become a valuable screening modality. A strategy that utilizes VC for population-based screening over the age of 50 and OC for screening high-risk individuals and those with positive VC findings would result in a significantly reduced rate of colon cancer deaths.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473367      PMCID: PMC2869208          DOI: 10.1517/17530051003658736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn        ISSN: 1753-0059


  83 in total

1.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Screening for colon cancer: programs of the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Purkayastha; P P Tekkis; T Athanasiou; O Aziz; R Negus; W Gedroyc; A W Darzi
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Relationship of polyps to cancer of the large intestine.

Authors:  B D Simons; A S Morrison; R Lev; W Verhoek-Oftedahl
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-06-17       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.

Authors:  James E Allison; Lori C Sakoda; Theodore R Levin; Jo P Tucker; Irene S Tekawa; Thomas Cuff; Mary Pat Pauly; Lyle Shlager; Albert M Palitz; Wei K Zhao; J Sanford Schwartz; David F Ransohoff; Joseph V Selby
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist; Daniel J Sargent; Charles L Loprinzi; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; Kandice Knigge; M Peter Lance; Lawrence J Burgart; Stanley R Hamilton; James E Allison; Michael J Lawson; Mary E Devens; Jonathan J Harrington; Shauna L Hillman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

1.  Experiences of Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Sara Shamim; Yvette Lena Margareta Andresen; Henriette Vind Thaysen; Ida Hovdenak Jakobsen; Jannie Nielsen; Anne Kjaergaard Danielsen; Hanne Konradsen
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-02-11

2.  An Adaptive Learning Model for Multiscale Texture Features in Polyp Classification via Computed Tomographic Colonography.

Authors:  Weiguo Cao; Marc J Pomeroy; Shu Zhang; Jiaxing Tan; Zhengrong Liang; Yongfeng Gao; Almas F Abbasi; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Multi-scale characterizations of colon polyps via computed tomographic colonography.

Authors:  Weiguo Cao; Marc J Pomeroy; Yongfeng Gao; Matthew A Barish; Almas F Abbasi; Perry J Pickhardt; Zhengrong Liang
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2019-12-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.