Literature DB >> 7283410

Examination of major disagreements in susceptibility test results by Autobac-1 and MS-2.

N J Lindsey, W G Barnes.   

Abstract

Major disagreements between two automated susceptibility test instruments, Autobac-1 and MS-2, generated from 4,213 tests on 630 bacterial isolates, were analyzed. The major disagreement rate between the instruments was only 7.4%. The highest major disagreement rates for bacteria were with Staphylococcus epidermidis, enterococci, gram-positive bacilli, and Providencia species, and those for antibiotics were with ampicillin and penicillin G. With most other bacteria and antibiotics, the instruments disagreed at a rate less than 10% and frequently at a rate less than 4%. However, 32 specific bacterium-antibiotic combinations exceeded a 10% rate. Possible reasons for some of these higher disagreement rates are discussed. Reconciliation of instrument results with the standard agar disk diffusion result for each major disagreement revealed that about 15% were irreconcilable and, of the remaining 259, 177 agreed with MS-2 and 82 agreed with Autobac-1. Major disagreements between instruments seemed random, but there appeared to be tendencies, with certain bacteria and certain antibiotics, for MS-2 to detect susceptible reactions more consistently than resistant ones and for Autobac-1 to detect resistant reactions more consistently than susceptible ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7283410      PMCID: PMC181642          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.20.1.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  3 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Abbott MS-2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; J P Anhalt; J A Washington; L R McCarthy; F D Schoenknecht; J C Sherris; H J Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Prototype of a fully automated device for determination of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; A Reichler; D Wiseman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-12
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Use of the Autobac system for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Y de Rautlin de la Roy; E Chevalier-Burbaud; S Pannetier; F Souchaud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Accuracy and reproducibility of the AutoMicrobic System Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card for testing selected challenge organisms.

Authors:  H L Nadler; C Dolan; L Mele; S R Kurtz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Variation in the abilities of automated, commercial, and reference methods to detect methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S L Hansen; P K Freedy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by microdilution and disk elution susceptibility systems.

Authors:  J M Boyce; L S Lytle; D A Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Interlaboratory variation of antibiograms of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains with conventional and commercial testing systems.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; A Janney; C V Sanders; R L Marier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.