Literature DB >> 7186904

Comparison of Enteric-Tek with API 20E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

D A Bruckner, V Clark, W J Martin.   

Abstract

Enteric-Tek (Flow Laboratories, Inc., Roslyn, N.Y.) is a new system designed for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and consists of a round, multicompartmented plastic plate with 11 peripheral wells and 1 center well incorporating 14 biochemical reactions. Only one reagent (Kovacs reagent) is required to complete the biochemical test results for generation of a five-digit number for computer code identification. The identification accuracy of the Enteric-Tek system was compared with those obtained by conventional methods and API 20E. The Enteric-Tek system was found to be not only a convenient and simple method for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae, but also to be highly reliable, giving excellent identification performance as compared to API 20E and conventional methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7186904      PMCID: PMC272014          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.16-18.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Repliscan system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S D Brown; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Identification of Enterobacteriaceae in frozen microdilution trays prepared by Micro-Media Systems.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal; L J Effinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M T Kelly; J M Latimer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; B B Gardner; S J Clark; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of API 20E and invA PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica isolates from swine production units.

Authors:  Daniele M Nucera; Carol W Maddox; Patricia Hoien-Dalen; Ronald M Weigel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of rapid NFT and API 20E with conventional methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermentative bacilli from pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.

Authors:  M J Palmieri; S L Carito; R F Meyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Performance of two four-hour identification systems with atypical strains of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M Altwegg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Comparison of media in the Anaerobe-Tek and Presumpto plate systems and evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of commonly encountered anaerobes.

Authors:  G L Lombard; D N Whaley; V R Dowell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the DMS Rapid E system for identification of clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M W Keville; G V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  C B Castillo; D A Bruckner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.