Literature DB >> 7024296

Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

M T Kelly, J M Latimer.   

Abstract

Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae Biochemical Card was evaluated. Recent clinical isolates of enteric gram-negative bacilli (192) and glucose nonfermenters (3) were identified by the AutoMicrobic System, Micro-Media Systems, Micro-ID, API, and Enterotube II in comparison with conventional methods. The AutoMicrobic System and Micro-Media Systems correctly identified 97% of the organisms tested. Micro-ID, API, and Enterotube II correctly identified 94, 92, and 84% of the organisms, respectively. In addition to a high degree of identification accuracy, the AutoMicrobic System was convenient to operate and produced identification results in 8 h. Operation of the AutoMicrobic System also required minimal personnel time because it automatically monitored and interpreted the biochemical reactions and reported organism identifications. The AutoMicrobic System appears to be an efficient and accurate system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7024296      PMCID: PMC273666          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.12.5.659-662.1980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  The Automicrobic System for urines.

Authors:  D P Nicholson; J A Koepke
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the modified Micro-ID system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  W J Buesching; D L Rhoden; A O Esaias; P B Smith; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of Micro-Media Quad Panels for identification of the Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S A Kelly; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Identification of Enterobacteriaceae in frozen microdilution trays prepared by Micro-Media Systems.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal; L J Effinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the further improved Enterotube and Encise II.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; J S Scherber; J O Cosgrove
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Multi-laboratory evaluation of an automated microbial detection/identification system.

Authors:  P B Smith; T L Gavan; H D Isenberg; A Sonnenwirth; W I Taylor; J A Washington; A Balows
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  23 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of the Roche Cobas IDA and Enterotube II systems for identifying members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  B Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Autoscan Walkaway system for rapid identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M T Kelly; C Leicester
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of API 20E and invA PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica isolates from swine production units.

Authors:  Daniele M Nucera; Carol W Maddox; Patricia Hoien-Dalen; Ronald M Weigel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Enterosistem 18-R: description and comparative evaluation with conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  R Piccolomini; A Di Girolamo; G Catamo; L Cellini; N Allocati; G Ravagnan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D Sahm; C O'Hara; C Ciaglia; M Yu; N Yamane; G Scharnweber; D Rhoden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid conventional scheme for biochemical identification of antibiotic resistant enterobacteriaceae isolates from urine.

Authors:  J D Perry; M Ford; N Hjersing; F K Gould
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M J Bale; K R Schulte; F P Koontz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; M R Jacobs; M K Buick; M M Flanagan; G A Gymer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Use of the automicrobic and enteric-tek systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J Goldstein; J J Guarneri; P Della-Latta; J Scherer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of a two-hour method for screening pathogens from stool specimens.

Authors:  L C Greene; P C Appelbaum; J A Kellogg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.