Literature DB >> 6761359

Comparison of media in the Anaerobe-Tek and Presumpto plate systems and evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of commonly encountered anaerobes.

G L Lombard, D N Whaley, V R Dowell.   

Abstract

Using a variety of sporeforming and nonsporeforming anaerobic bacteria, we compared 10 differential agar media of the Anaerobe-Tek (A/T) system recently marketed by Flow Laboratories, Inc. (McLean, Va.) with 10 comparable media in Presumpto quadrant plates (Presumpto 1, 2, and 3) developed by the Centers for Disease Control Anaerobic Bacteria Branch. The A/T identification system was evaluated by comparing the species identity of anaerobes determined as recommended by the manufacturer's instruction manual with the identity of the strains obtained by the Centers for Disease Control Anaerobe Reference Laboratory by using conventional procedures. We also compared reactions obtained with the Presumpto plates with a chopped meat glucose broth culture as a source of inoculum with those obtained by using a turbid cell suspension from growth on blood agar as inoculum. The agreement of results for the 16 characteristics compared ranged from 92.8 to 100%. Comparison of test results obtained with 10 media in the Presumpto plate and A/T systems from the examination of 223 strains of anaerobes, representing 54 different taxa, showed the following agreement between A/T and CDC systems: catalase production, esculin hydrolysis, glucose fermentation, and lecithinase production (100%); inhibition of growth by bile agar (99.6%); lipase production (99%); DNase (98.7%); fermentation of lactose and mannitol (98.2%); starch hydrolysis (96.9%); gelatin hydrolysis (96.4%); and casein hydrolysis (94.6%). Of the 204 strains of common anaerobes tested with the A/T system, only 70% were correctly identified to the species level. However, several strains could have been identified correctly with the A/T system if data on certain other characteristics had been included in the A/T data base.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6761359      PMCID: PMC272541          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.16.6.1066-1072.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Four methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermenting rods: organisms more commonly encountered in clinical specimens.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; J Stavitz; M S Bentz; L C von Kuster
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of Enteric-Tek with API 20E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D A Bruckner; V Clark; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of commercial systems for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  P I Bowman; D G Ahearn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Simple disk technique for detection of nitrate reduction by anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  P A Wideman; D M Citronbaum; V L Sutter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek system for rapid presumptive identification of medically important yeasts.

Authors:  B H Cooper; J B Johnson; E S Thaxton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Cultural and physiological characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium botulinum isolates from foodborne and infant botulism cases.

Authors:  M Dezfulian; V R Dowell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Sodium polyanethol sulfonate sensitivity of anaerobic cocci.

Authors:  M H Graves; J A Morello; F E Kocka
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-06
  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Use of Presumpto Plates to identify anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  D N Whaley; L S Wiggs; P H Miller; P U Srivastava; J M Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Development and evaluation of a miniaturised method as an aid to the identification of clinically important anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  P N Levett
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  W J Buesching; J R Svirbely; L W Ayers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Accuracy and reproducibility of a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; C S Kaufmann; J W Depenbusch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; C S Kaufmann; J C Keifer; H J Venbrux
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.

Authors:  T T Kitch; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.