Literature DB >> 7003663

The epipodophyllotoxin derivatives VM-26 and VP-16-213, 1976-1979, a review.

N I Nissen, P Dombernowsky, H H Hansen, A G Pedersen.   

Abstract

The epipodophyllotoxin derivatives VM 26 and VP 16-213 are currently entering phase III studies. The mechanism of their action is incompletely understood, but the greatest lethal effect is experienced in the late S and G2 phases. In transplanted tumors both drugs have shown marked schedule dependency and human studies also support this. As a single agent VP 16-213 is among the most active drugs in small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Significant clinical activity (> 20% response frequency) has been observed for both drugs in Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin lymphomas and possibly in other more rare tumors (monocytic leukemia, hepatoma and teratoma). Although further clinical studies of both drugs would be ideal, it seems possible at present to justify a discontinuation of VM-26 in order to concentrate the efforts on VP 16-213. Further studies are needed to define optimal dose and schedule and place in combination chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7003663     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81488-4_14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res        ISSN: 0080-0015


  7 in total

Review 1.  VM26: phase I and II studies.

Authors:  F R Macbeth
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide.

Authors:  V J Harvey; M L Slevin; S P Joel; A Johnston; P F Wrigley
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Current development of podophyllotoxins.

Authors:  R Canetta; P Hilgard; S Florentine; P Bedogni; L Lenaz
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation.

Authors:  M L Slevin; S P Joel; R Whomsley; K Devenport; V J Harvey; R J Osborne; P F Wrigley
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Schedule-dependent topoisomerase II-inhibiting drugs.

Authors:  S P Joel; M L Slevin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  The effect of food and concurrent chemotherapy on the bioavailability of oral etoposide.

Authors:  V J Harvey; M L Slevin; S P Joel; A Johnston; P F Wrigley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.