Literature DB >> 3004772

The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide.

V J Harvey, M L Slevin, S P Joel, A Johnston, P F Wrigley.   

Abstract

The bioavailability of orally administered etoposide varies considerably. The effect of dose on bioavailability has not previously been investigated. In this study six patients were each treated with oral etoposide at doses of 200, 400, and 600 mg, and the pharmacokinetics determined. Each patient acted as his own control. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was proportionately greatest at the lowest dose. Doubling the dose from 200 mg to 400 mg increased AUC by only 50%, and a further increase of only 2.2% occurred at a dose of 600 mg. These data show nonlinear bioavailability of etoposide within the range in clinical use and may explain the variable results of reported studies. The data may have important implications for chemotherapy regimens with oral etoposide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3004772     DOI: 10.1007/bf00256172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  18 in total

1.  A comparison of the mechanisms of action of VP-16-213 and podophyllotoxin.

Authors:  S B Horwitz; J D Loike
Journal:  Lloydia       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb

2.  Phase I trial of a new form of an oral administration of VP-16-213.

Authors:  M E Lau; H H Hansen; N I Nissen; H Pedersen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1979-03

Review 3.  VM 26 and VP 16-213: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  M Rozencweig; D D Von Hoff; J E Henney; F M Muggia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  STRIPE: an interactive computer program for the analysis of drug pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A Johnston; R C Woollard
Journal:  J Pharmacol Methods       Date:  1983-05

5.  High-performance liquid chromatography of etoposide in plasma and urine.

Authors:  V J Harvey; S P Joel; A Johnston; M L Slevin
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1985-05-03

Review 6.  VP16-213 (etoposide). A critical review of its activity.

Authors:  F Cavalli
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  The epipodophyllotoxin derivatives VM-26 and VP-16-213, 1976-1979, a review.

Authors:  N I Nissen; P Dombernowsky; H H Hansen; A G Pedersen
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1980

8.  High-dose VP-16-213 and autologous bone marrow transplantation for refractory malignancies: a phase I study.

Authors:  S N Wolff; M F Fer; C M McKay; K R Hande; J D Hainsworth; F A Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Podophyllotoxin derivative VP 16-213.

Authors:  A M Arnold
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Etoposide (VP-16-213).

Authors:  B F Issell; S T Crooke
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The oral route for the administration of cytotoxic drugs: strategies to increase the efficiency and consistency of drug delivery.

Authors:  H A Bardelmeijer; O van Tellingen; J H Schellens; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Extensive stage small cell carcinoma of the bronchus. A randomised study of etoposide given orally by one-day or five-day schedule together with intravenous adriamycin and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  G M Mead; J Thompson; J W Sweetenham; R B Buchanan; J M Whitehouse; C J Williams
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Frederik E Stuurman; Bastiaan Nuijen; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Inhibition of OCTN2-mediated transport of carnitine by etoposide.

Authors:  Chaoxin Hu; Cynthia S Lancaster; Zhili Zuo; Shuiying Hu; Zhaoyuan Chen; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Sharyn D Baker; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 6.  Etoposide and teniposide. Bioanalysis, metabolism and clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J J Holthuis
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1988-06-17

7.  Etoposide combination therapy for small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  R P Abratt; P A Willcox; R H Hewitson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs in children.

Authors:  W R Crom; A M Glynn-Barnhart; J H Rodman; M E Teresi; R E Kavanagh; M L Christensen; M V Relling; W E Evans
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Species difference in intestinal absorption mechanism of etoposide and digoxin between cynomolgus monkey and rat.

Authors:  T Nishimura; Y Kato; N Amano; M Ono; Y Kubo; Y Kimura; H Fujita; A Tsuji
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.