Literature DB >> 2994705

The effect of food and concurrent chemotherapy on the bioavailability of oral etoposide.

V J Harvey, M L Slevin, S P Joel, A Johnston, P F Wrigley.   

Abstract

There is no information on the effect of food or concurrent drug administration on the bioavailability of oral etoposide, despite the fact that treatment is frequently administered over several days and most often in combination with other cytotoxic agents. The influence of these factors has been studied in 11 patients, receiving combination cytotoxic therapy for extensive small cell lung carcinoma. Neither food nor concurrent oral or intravenous chemotherapy had a significant effect on the mean plasma concentrations of etoposide, achieved following oral administration. Wide variation in peak plasma concentrations and in area under the concentration time curve (AUC) occurred both between and within patients. It appears unnecessary for patients receiving etoposide (at 100 mg) to fast prior to drug administration. Furthermore, oral etoposide (at 100 mg and at 400 mg) may be given in combination with other cytotoxic agents without compromising its bioavailability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2994705      PMCID: PMC1977207          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1985.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  VP-16-213 monotherapy for remission induction of small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial using three dosage schedules.

Authors:  F Cavalli; R W Sonntag; F Jungi; H J Senn; K W Brunner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-03

Review 2.  VM 26 and VP 16-213: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  M Rozencweig; D D Von Hoff; J E Henney; F M Muggia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Schedule dependency of the antileukemic activity of the podophyllotoxin-derivative VP 16-213 (NSC-141540) in L1210 leukemia.

Authors:  P Dombernowsky; N I Nissen
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A       Date:  1973-09

Review 4.  Influence of food on the bioavailability of drugs.

Authors:  A Melander
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Enterotoxic effect of methotrexate: does it influence the drug's absorption in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia?

Authors:  C R Pinkerton; J F Glasgow; J M Bridges; S G Welshman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-04-18

Review 6.  The epipodophyllotoxin derivatives VM-26 and VP-16-213, 1976-1979, a review.

Authors:  N I Nissen; P Dombernowsky; H H Hansen; A G Pedersen
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1980

7.  The fifth Myron Karon Memorial Lecture. The cure of cancer by chemotherapy - reflections on how it happened.

Authors:  C G Zubrod
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1980

8.  Food, splanchnic blood flow, and bioavailability of drugs subject to first-pass metabolism.

Authors:  A J McLean; P J McNamara; P duSouich; M Gibaldi; D Lalka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Podophyllotoxin derivative VP 16-213.

Authors:  A M Arnold
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Can food influence the absorption of methotrexate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia?

Authors:  C R Pinkerton; S G Welshman; J F Glasgow; J M Bridges
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-11-01       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Effects of food on the clinical pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents: underlying mechanisms and implications for oral chemotherapy.

Authors:  Brahma N Singh; Bimal K Malhotra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Extensive stage small cell carcinoma of the bronchus. A randomised study of etoposide given orally by one-day or five-day schedule together with intravenous adriamycin and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  G M Mead; J Thompson; J W Sweetenham; R B Buchanan; J M Whitehouse; C J Williams
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Etoposide and teniposide. Bioanalysis, metabolism and clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J J Holthuis
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1988-06-17

5.  Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). Correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters to clinical and biochemical data from patients receiving etoposide.

Authors:  K H Pflüger; L Schmidt; M Merkel; H Jungclas; K Havemann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs in children.

Authors:  W R Crom; A M Glynn-Barnhart; J H Rodman; M E Teresi; R E Kavanagh; M L Christensen; M V Relling; W E Evans
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with anticancer drugs.

Authors:  P M Loadman; M C Bibby
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Pharmacological attempts to improve the bioavailability of oral etoposide.

Authors:  S P Joel; P I Clark; L Heap; L Webster; S Robbins; H Craft; M L Slevin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.