Literature DB >> 3297462

The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

P I Clark, M L Slevin.   

Abstract

Etoposide and teniposide are semisynthetic derivatives of podophyllotoxin and are increasingly used in cancer medicine. Teniposide is more highly protein-bound than etoposide, and its uptake and binding to cells is also greater. Etoposide and teniposide are phase-specific cytotoxic drugs acting in the late S and early G2 phases of the cell cycle. They appear to act by causing breaks in DNA via an interaction with DNA topoisomerase II or by the formation of free radicals. Teniposide is more potent as regards the production of DNA damage and cytotoxicity. Most studies show a biexponential decay following intravenous administration of etoposide and teniposide. The terminal elimination half-life of etoposide is less than that of teniposide, and the plasma and renal clearances of etoposide are greater. The peak plasma concentrations of drug and the area under the concentration versus time curve are linearly related to the intravenous dose of both drugs. Considerable interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters exists following intravenous etoposide and teniposide. Various metabolites of etoposide and teniposide have been identified but their detection and quantitation are disputed. Approximately 30 to 70% of a dose of etoposide is accounted for by excretion, whereas the figure appears to be only 5 to 20% for teniposide. The bioavailability of oral etoposide is about 50% but its absorption is not linear with increasing dose within the range in clinical use. There is considerable inter- and intrapatient variability in the pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide. There is no evidence of accumulation of etoposide and teniposide after multiple consecutive doses by the intravenous or oral routes. The exact roles of the liver and kidney in metabolism and excretion of etoposide and teniposide are uncertain. Etoposide has been shown to be a highly schedule-dependent drug in clinical studies. This together with the phase-specific action of etoposide and teniposide and their increasingly widespread use in cancer medicine make the clinical pharmacology of these drugs of great clinical importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3297462     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198712040-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  158 in total

1.  Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). I. A combined method of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  H Danigel; K H Pflüger; H Jungclas; L Schmidt; J Dellbrügge
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Interaction of drugs with microtubule proteins.

Authors:  L Wilson; J R Bamburg; S B Mizel; L M Grisham; K M Creswell
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-02

3.  Flux of teniposide (VM-26) across the plasma membrane of teniposide-resistant sublines of L1210 cells.

Authors:  T Lee; D Roberts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Structure-activity study of the inhibition of microtubule assembly in vitro by podophyllotoxin and its congeners.

Authors:  J D Loike; C F Brewer; H Sternlicht; W J Gensler; S B Horwitz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  VP16-213 (etoposide). A critical review of its activity.

Authors:  F Cavalli
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  PTG, a new antineoplastic epipodyphyllotoxin.

Authors:  P J Creaven; L M Allen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Etoposide (VP16-213) and teniposide (VM26) comparative in vitro activities in human tumors.

Authors:  B F Issell; C Tihon; M E Curry
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Allergic reactions to teniposide in patients with neuroblastoma and lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  F A Hayes; M Abromowitch; A A Green
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-04

Review 9.  Podophyllotoxin derivative VP 16-213.

Authors:  A M Arnold
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Comparison between VP 16 and VM 26 in Lewis lung carcinoma of the mouse.

Authors:  T Colombo; M Broggini; M Vaghi; G Amato; E Erba; M D'Incalci
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-02
View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Martin S Highley; Ernst A de Bruijn; Allan T van Oosterom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Second-line chemotherapy with long-term low-dose oral etoposide in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  M Bontenbal; A S Planting; J Verweij; R de Wit; W H Kruit; G Stoter; J G Klijn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Antineoplastic drugs in 1990. A review (Part II).

Authors:  D J Black; R B Livingston
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Randomized cross-over clinical trial to study potential pharmacokinetic interactions between cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide.

Authors:  Huw D Thomas; David J Porter; Imke Bartelink; Joy R Nobbs; Michael Cole; Suzie Elliott; David R Newell; A Hilary Calvert; Martin Highley; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Preformulation study of etoposide: identification of physicochemical characteristics responsible for the low and erratic oral bioavailability of etoposide.

Authors:  J C Shah; J R Chen; D Chow
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Topoisomerases as anticancer targets.

Authors:  Justine L Delgado; Chao-Ming Hsieh; Nei-Li Chan; Hiroshi Hiasa
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Pharmacokinetics of etoposide in rats with uranyl nitrate (UN)-induced acute renal failure (ARF): optimization of the duration of UN dosing.

Authors:  P Venkatesh; T Harisudhan; Hira Choudhury; Ramesh Mullangi; Nuggehally R Srinivas
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

8.  Protein binding of 2-chloro 2'-deoxyadenosine (cladribine) in healthy subjects and in patients with leukaemia.

Authors:  F Albertioni; L Herngren; G Juliusson; J Liliemark
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Targeting the systemic exposure of teniposide in the population and the individual using a stochastic therapeutic objective.

Authors:  D Z D'Argenio; J H Rodman
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-04

10.  A phase II trial of oral etoposide with mitoxantrone and ifosfamide/mesna consolidated with intravenous etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose arabinoside, and cisplatin as salvage therapy for relapsing and/or refractory lymphomas.

Authors:  J E Romaguera; M A Rodriguez; F B Hagemeister; P McLaughlin; F Swan; D F Moore; A H Sarris; A Younes; D Hill; F Cabanillas
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.