Literature DB >> 2758563

The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation.

M L Slevin1, S P Joel, R Whomsley, K Devenport, V J Harvey, R J Osborne, P F Wrigley.   

Abstract

The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide was investigated in ten patients with malignant mesothelioma who received single-agent etoposide as part of a phase II study. Etoposide pharmacokinetics were studied in each patient at oral dose levels of 100, 200, 300, 400 and 600 mg. At doses above 200 mg, the AUC and peak concentrations of etoposide were substantially lower than predictions based on the 100-mg dose. This study confirms previous observations that etoposide absorption is dose-dependent and that a mean bioavailability of approximately 50% cannot be assumed at total oral doses greater than 200 mg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2758563     DOI: 10.1007/BF00304768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  16 in total

1.  VP-16-213 monotherapy for remission induction of small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial using three dosage schedules.

Authors:  F Cavalli; R W Sonntag; F Jungi; H J Senn; K W Brunner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-03

Review 2.  VM 26 and VP 16-213: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  M Rozencweig; D D Von Hoff; J E Henney; F M Muggia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Activity of a new glycosidic lignan derivative (VP 16-213) related to podophyllotoxin in experimental tumors.

Authors:  H Stähelin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  STRIPE: an interactive computer program for the analysis of drug pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A Johnston; R C Woollard
Journal:  J Pharmacol Methods       Date:  1983-05

5.  High-performance liquid chromatography of etoposide in plasma and urine.

Authors:  V J Harvey; S P Joel; A Johnston; M L Slevin
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1985-05-03

Review 6.  VP16-213 (etoposide). A critical review of its activity.

Authors:  F Cavalli
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  The epipodophyllotoxin derivatives VM-26 and VP-16-213, 1976-1979, a review.

Authors:  N I Nissen; P Dombernowsky; H H Hansen; A G Pedersen
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1980

8.  High-dose VP-16-213 and autologous bone marrow transplantation for refractory malignancies: a phase I study.

Authors:  S N Wolff; M F Fer; C M McKay; K R Hande; J D Hainsworth; F A Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Podophyllotoxin derivative VP 16-213.

Authors:  A M Arnold
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Etoposide (VP-16-213).

Authors:  B F Issell; S T Crooke
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The oral route for the administration of cytotoxic drugs: strategies to increase the efficiency and consistency of drug delivery.

Authors:  H A Bardelmeijer; O van Tellingen; J H Schellens; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Etoposide phosphate, the water soluble prodrug of etoposide.

Authors:  A H Witterland; C H Koks; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1996-10

Review 3.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide.

Authors:  G Toffoli; G Corona; R Sorio; I Robieux; B Basso; A M Colussi; M Boiocchi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  A limited sampling model for the pharmacokinetics of etoposide given orally.

Authors:  D Gentili; M Zucchetti; V Torri; C Sessa; J de Jong; F Cavalli; M D'Incalci
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Millward; D R Newell; K Yuen; J P Matthews; K Balmanno; C J Charlton; L Gumbrell; M J Lind; F Chapman; M Proctor
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Pharmacological attempts to improve the bioavailability of oral etoposide.

Authors:  S P Joel; P I Clark; L Heap; L Webster; S Robbins; H Craft; M L Slevin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.

Authors:  R S de Jong; N H Mulder; D R Uges; S Kaul; B Winograd; H J Groen; P H Willemse; W T van der Graaf; E G de Vries
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Oral treatment with etoposide in small cell lung cancer - dilemmas and solutions.

Authors:  Renata Rezonja; Lea Knez; Tanja Cufer; Ales Mrhar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.