Literature DB >> 8070033

Schedule-dependent topoisomerase II-inhibiting drugs.

S P Joel1, M L Slevin.   

Abstract

A number of topoisomerase II-acting drugs have been described, but few demonstrate schedule-dependent anti-tumour activity. The activity of the epipodophyllotoxins etoposide and teniposide and the acridine dye derivative amsacrine is clearly schedule-dependent, and this related not only to the observation that the activity of topoisomerase II varies throughout the cell cycle but also to the finding that these drugs are rapidly cleared from the cell following exposure, permitting DNA repair. Etoposide has been most clearly shown to be schedule dependent in clinical studies. The response rates of patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving a 24-h infusion was only 10% as compared with 89% when the same dose was given over 5 days. Pharmacokinetic studies performed in these patients demonstrated that although the total systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC) was the same in both arms of the study, the duration of exposure to low levels of drug (> 1 microgram/ml) was doubled in the 5-day arm. Haematological toxicity was the same in both arms of the study, as was the duration of exposure to higher plasma levels (> 5 micrograms/ml), suggesting that this toxicity may be associated with higher plasma concentrations, whereas anti-tumour activity is related to prolonged exposure to low levels of drug. This was confirmed in a subsequent study, where prolongation of treatment to 8 days compared to 5 days resulted in a similar exposure to low plasma concentrations and no difference in response rates or survival. Haematological toxicity in this study was worse in the 5-day arm, which also had an increase exposure to high levels of drug (> 5 micrograms/ml). More recently, interest has focused on even more prolonged etoposide administration, typically involving small daily doses repeated for 14-21 days. Although this schedule shows high activity in relapsed small-cell lung cancer and lymphoma, it is associated with significant toxicity (around one-third of patients experience grade III/IV leukopenia or neutropenia), which may be related to the observation that the etoposide dose delivered per course in these studies is higher than that obtained with standard dosing over 3-5 days. Further randomised studies are required to determine the optimal dose and schedule of etoposide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8070033     DOI: 10.1007/bf00684869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  28 in total

1.  Local base sequence preferences for DNA cleavage by mammalian topoisomerase II in the presence of amsacrine or teniposide.

Authors:  Y Pommier; G Capranico; A Orr; K W Kohn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Prolonged administration of oral etoposide in patients with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

Authors:  D H Johnson; F A Greco; J Strupp; K R Hande; J D Hainsworth
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  VP-16-213 monotherapy for remission induction of small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial using three dosage schedules.

Authors:  F Cavalli; R W Sonntag; F Jungi; H J Senn; K W Brunner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-03

Review 4.  VP16-213 (etoposide). A critical review of its activity.

Authors:  F Cavalli
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  A comparative assessment of the in vitro effects of drugs on cells by means of colony assays or flow microfluorimetry.

Authors:  B T Hill; R D Whelan; H T Rupniak; L Y Dennis; M A Rosholt
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Phase III comparison of doxorubicin and dacarbazine given by bolus versus infusion in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  M Zalupski; B Metch; S Balcerzak; W S Fletcher; R Chapman; J D Bonnet; G R Weiss; J Ryan; R S Benjamin; L H Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Survival and cycle-progression delay of human lymphoma cells in vitro exposed to VP-16-213.

Authors:  B Drewinko; B Barlogie
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-09

8.  Evaluation of anticancer drug schedule dependency using an in vitro human tumor clonogenic assay.

Authors:  R Ludwig; D S Alberts; T P Miller; S E Salmon
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  The activity of 10-, 14-, and 21-day schedules of single-agent etoposide in previously untreated patients with extensive small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P I Clark; B Cottier
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of VP-16-213 and implications for chemotherapy.

Authors:  S N Wolff; W W Grosh; K Prater; K R Hande
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.