Literature DB >> 6835306

The value of the autopsy in three medical eras.

L Goldman, R Sayson, S Robbins, L H Cohn, M Bettmann, M Weisberg.   

Abstract

To determine whether advances in diagnostic procedures have reduced the value of autopsies, we analyzed 100 randomly selected autopsies from each of the academic years 1960, 1970, and 1980 at one university teaching hospital. In all three eras about 10 per cent of the autopsies revealed a major diagnosis that, if known before death, might have led to a change in therapy and prolonged survival; another 12 per cent showed a clinically missed major diagnosis for which treatment would not have been changed. Among 1980 autopsies, renal disease and pulmonary embolus were less common causes of death than before, but systemic bacterial, viral, and fungal infections increased significantly and were missed clinically 24 per cent of the time. The introduction of radionuclide scans, ultrasound, and computerized tomography as diagnostic procedures did not reduce the use of conventional tests in patients who subsequently died and were studied by autopsy. Over-reliance on these new procedures occasionally contributed directly to missed major diagnoses. We conclude that advances in diagnostic technology have not reduced the value of the autopsy, and that a goal-directed autopsy remains a vital component in the assurance of good medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6835306     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198304283081704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  147 in total

1.  Perinatal autopsy--a seven-year study.

Authors:  S Rajashekar; B V Bhat; A J Veliath; C Ratnakar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study.

Authors:  Malcolm Brodlie; Ian A Laing; Jean W Keeling; Kathryn J McKenzie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

3.  Medical error reporting must take necropsy data into account.

Authors:  J Sington; B Cottrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

4.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Death of the teaching autopsy: autopsy is a success story in Cuba.

Authors:  Alfredo Espinosa-Brito; Julian Viera-Yaniz; Osmel Chavez-Troya; Raul Nieto-Cabrera
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

6.  Death of the teaching autopsy: advances in technology have not reduced the value of the autopsy.

Authors:  Gema Frühbeck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

7.  Should the autopsy be resuscitated?

Authors:  F Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Measuring errors and adverse events in health care.

Authors:  Eric J Thomas; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Is autopsy dead in the ICU?

Authors:  A Esteban; P Fernández-Segoviano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.