Literature DB >> 21938498

[Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

H Moch1.   

Abstract

Multiple factors have affected the decline in autopsy rates. Discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and findings at autopsy are frequently used as an argument for a high autopsy rate. However, the quality of the diagnosis is independent of the autopsy rate. A long-term study covering the years 1972-2002 in the University Hospital Zurich has documented a significant reduction of diagnostic errors in internal medicine. Major diagnostic errors (class 1) declined from 16% (1972), to 9% (1982), to 7% (1992) to 2% (2002). The main reason is the availability of new diagnostic procedures. In 2010 the analysis of class 1 diagnostic errors throughout the hospital documented class 1 discrepancies in only 1%. This low number of diagnostic errors has been published in the annual quality report of the University Hospital Zurich. The documentation of this improvement in the quality report of the hospital provides the opportunity to convince clinicians, health politicians and the hospital administration to support autopsies in teaching as well as non-teaching hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21938498     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-011-1521-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  23 in total

1.  Effect of simple interventions on necropsy rate when active informed consent is required.

Authors:  A Lugli; M Anabitarte; J H Beer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Mourad Mokhtari; Anne Couvelard; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Jérôme Baudot; Dominique Hénin; Claude Gibert; Jean Chastre
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-02-23

3.  The value of autopsy, believe it or not.

Authors:  Jan G Zijlstra
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The vanishing nonforensic autopsy.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Elizabeth C Burton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Medical uncertainty and the autopsy: occult benefits for students.

Authors:  R E Anderson; R C Fox; R B Hill
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 6.  Maximizing the benefits of autopsy for clinicians and families. What needs to be done.

Authors:  S J McPhee
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer.

Authors:  R A Hayward; T P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses.

Authors:  R M Battle; D Pathak; C G Humble; C R Key; P R Vanatta; R B Hill; R E Anderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Accuracy of death certificates: a population-based, complete-coverage, one-year autopsy study in East Germany.

Authors:  D Modelmog; S Rahlenbeck; D Trichopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  The relation of autopsy rate to physicians' beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Burton; Russell S Phillips; Kenneth E Covinsky; Laura P Sands; Lee Goldman; Neal V Dawson; Alfred F Connors; C Seth Landefeld
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  4 in total

1.  ["Hic gaudet mors succurere vitae", autopsy findings of the Mainz Institute of Pathology 1971-2010. An analysis on the occasion of the 100 year jubilee].

Authors:  T Hansen; S Höring; F Rosendahl; M Dusolt; C Kempe; M Hechtner; C Sommer; C J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  [Clinical autopsies in Switzerland : A status report].

Authors:  A-K Rodewald; P Bode; G Cathomas; H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Restoration of an academic historical gross pathology collection-refreshed impact on current medical teaching?

Authors:  Philip Eichhorn; Udo Andraschke; Fritz Dross; Carol I Geppert; Arndt Hartmann; Tilman T Rau
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  [Adult autopsies during the past decade in Germany : Data from two university hospitals].

Authors:  F Erlmeier; W Weichert; R Knüchel; J Andruszkow
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.